You claim:
There is no reason that post should have made it into the biological evolution section. Unless..., the administration here is either proselytizing or it was an honest mistake. And we all know in our secret heart space that it's the former.
Let's parse your claim.
You seem to think that a question related to Biological Evolution ("What evidence, when Darwin/Wallace began work made them think of evolution?") should not go in the Biological Evolution forum. The possibilities were:
- The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy. Since it has nothing to do with the Bible, that is out.
- Big Bang and Cosmology: Since it is unrelated to either of those, that forum is out.
- Dates and Dating: Since it was unrelated to either Dates or Dating, that would not be a good choice.
- Geology and the Great Flood: Nothing in there related to either Geology or to the Flood.
- Human Origins and Evolution: Nothing in the OP related to Human Origins so that would not be a reasonable forum.
- Intelligent Design: Nothing in the opening post related to Intelligent Design.
- Is It Science? Again, there was nothing related to that issue.
- Miscellaneous Topics in Creation/Evolution: This is a catch all place for things that do not fit somewhere else.
- Origin of Life: Questions about Darwin or Evolution have nothing to do with the Origin of life so this forum would be inappropriate.
That leaves Biological Evolution, which since the question does directly deal with Biological Evolution seems a reasonable choice.
If you can make a case for placing it somewhere else, please feel free to try to do so, but it's pretty clear that the placement was certainly reasonable, certainly not proselytizing.
Don't deny the truth. I wanted examples of how this applies and everyone that's posted has been off topic and made argument ad hominem. Yet no Mod to moderate, i'm not surprised.
Can you provide support for your assertion showing where my replies have been off topic or "ad hominem"?
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion