And if you define life as "the genome", which Seth does, then life most certainly is digital.
I don't define life as the genome. I don't define thought/intelligence as logic. I suspect that we are seeing two different versions of the same mistake.
Life generates intelligence/thought. If life is digital, it would follow that intelligence is digital. Since I am quite certain that intelligence is not digital, it would seem to follow that life also is not digital.
You don't seem to have read the .pdf.
I'll grant that I have not yet finished it.
You seem to be jumping to conclusions.
As long as they are the right conclusions, then no harm done
Let's end the political smears