Evolutionary superiority

A quick review of the last ten posts or so show very low quality posts that of course have nothing to do with the topic. In a bid to save this topic I offer the following:Superiority Of Genesis Evolutionary superiority is the chosen title of this topic and I interpret this to mean that evolutionists really believe their theory to be superior over Creationism. Well, let's look at the facts and see:1. Evolution is an interpretation of physical evidence.2. Creationism is based on the Textual evidence of Genesis chapters one and two, and an interpretation of the same physical evidence that evolution relies upon. According to all polling data over half of all adults in the U.S. are creationists.It is my contention that anytime a theory is based strictly on physical evidence that this type of theory is inferior. It is inferior because physical evidence can be interpreted anyway that bias requires it to be interpreted.It is also my contention that a theory based on the Textual evidence of Genesis is superior because the two chapters at issue require infinetly less interpretation than physical evidence. Genesis one and two, whatever they actually say, are communicating that living things owe their existence to direct Divine power. Am I saying these two chapters require no interpretation? No, I did not say that. I summarized what they convey for the origin of living things and contend that this evidence requires far less interpreting than physical evidence; AND the Textual evidence at issue here (chapters one and two) is infinetly more bias proof than physical evidence which can easily be manipulated to say whatever one needs it to say. Based on these arguments and points, Creationism is superior and Evolution inferior.Example: Genesis says living things haved a sudden special creation beginning. This claim is corroborated scientifically by the Cambrian explosion. In fact, we could not ask for better physical evidence confirming Genesis special creation. We have literary corresponding to physical (= scientific fact). If evolution were true, the Cambrian explosion should not even exist.To reiterate: the Textual evidence is more bias proof than physical evidence because physical evidence can be interpreted anyway that one needs it to be interpreted. Whereas the Textual evidence is not so. This evidence cannot be legitimately interpreted to say anything other than sudden beginnings out of nowhere accomplished by direct Divine power. Interpretation is spectacularly corroborated by the Cambrian explosion. Now we see why half of all adults in the U.S. are creationists - because Creationism is superior to Evolutionism. Evolution interpretation of the Cambrian explosion, based on these arguments, is exposed to be false protecting an unjustified bias.RayEdited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.