Starting a new thread because we were dragging a different one radically off topic.
Here's the issue -
LudoRepham writes on why he feels it's important for the nation to ban gay marriage:
..my reasons for the Nation would be that if you legalize gay marraige, you promote a lifestyle that is Immoral and sickening.
My question is this -
How do we determine that homosexuality is "immoral and sickening"? Either the sexual acts, the relationships, or the idea of gay marriage. Any of them.
I've heard this arguement - "Cuz the Bible sez it is!". I don't buy that. There needs to be a solid, rational, reasoning behind what's said if it's to be obeyed. There is PLENTY in the Bible which is not rational and therefore completely ignored - sacrific a goat lately, anyone?
There are plenty of cultures who do not rely on the Bible for the establishment of moral codes. Further, the Bible doesn't cover new acts, leaving us with questions like - "Is cow tipping immoral?" "Is reading someone else's email immoral?" etc.
What I am looking for in this thread is for someone who is anti-"gay marriage", anti-"gay sex", or anti-"gay people caring about one another" to muscle up and explain why these three things are "immoral" without simply falling back onto "cuz it says so" type arguements.
Here's an example of a non-"says so" based argument--
I would argue that cow tipping is immoral because it causes unwanted harm to a living creature for no more benefit than human amusement.
I would rank cow tippings as less of an offense than say cock-fights, which are likewise immoral for the same reasons.
Edited by Nuggin, : Clarifying