quote:
DNAunion: So if something’s distribution is far from being equal, it can correctly be said to be nonrandom. Thus, it can be correctly stated that genomes with hotspots — mutations that are clearly not evenly distributed throughout the genome - have mutations that are not truly random.
quote:
Crashfrog: Just curious: By extension, when I go to the Indian casino up the road and shoot craps, does the fact that the craps roll only happens at the craps table and never in the lobby or by the Bingo games - that is to say, not "equally spacially distributed" - mean that the craps roll is nonrandom?
Okay, since you seem incapable of figuring out where you made any kind of material change:
ME: I discussed mutations in a genome, the only place where "they" occur
YOU: You switched to discussing rolling craps at a craps table only, instead of rolling craps at the craps table and in the lobby and at the Bingo table, adding places where the event isn’t even supposed to occur.
You can’t see how your analogy doesn’t parallel my original...where you strayed?
Even if you don't, can't you see that arguing against me on this is pointless? I've already won, now that I’ve quoted the strongly anti-Creationist biologist Richard Dawkins stating that hotspots do show mutations to not be random, in that sense. So anyone trying to say I am wrong has already been refuted. But hey, if want to continue trying to prove a point you never can, be my guest.