KRISTV IESVS - VI, VI, SEI - uno, due, tre, quattro, cinque, sei, sette

Now you too. In case you're deceived by theology, or by vibers[religion].You can receive the same sign of the beast, a bear's right hand on vertical and diagonal line.By an immediate time, all the pastures have recept, and drunk from it.All the same false masters, have it in form of doctrine; since, in Vatican, people have sanctified the sign.Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

I have a question for you, Zsgeha Zsfira. What do you mean exactly when you say I am just curious as to the origin of your thoughts. Are you reading and studying some spiritual teachers? Who are they?

It's an ancient Romanian-Mediterranean popular saying, often pronounced in Latin linguages.According the Portuguese Dictionaries:mary-go-with-others - "maria-vai-com-as-outras" means:1. - person weak of mind (decision or; opinion), that let herself to be guided by others.In the following case, she does everything good by the right mode:"With her whole soul and until her death, she faithfully let herself be guided by the Lord, giving herself incessantly with the generosity of her youth. ...
http://www.mountaviat.org/articles.html - 7k"In which form she would be guided by other maries?- by having no idea or interest to pronounce the Name, because, you call upon the Name (the true pronounce of the real eternal hebrew Name), or you call upon a "version" of the reality, another "form", and not the eternal (that CANNOT change in "forms") intrinsic in the true and real, and not intrinsic in a "version" or the real, that comes from the trhone of the dragon.Much more guided by other maries, wouldn't be someone who "knows" that the title "Lord", centuries gone, have been inserted to replace the name, in more than 4.500 places in the Scriptures, and the same "someone-that-follow-other-mary" still try with persuasive words, to convince people that title is a name.IN THE SAME DICTIONARY2. - a kind of mary that have a tendence to let herself (or; her guidance; opinion) be led (or; commanded) by another "mary" that did the same thing because of an unknown first mary. [A Fool Circle].Public Opinion. ... and pro-choice 76% agree a woman who has had an abortion can be a
good Christian 80% agree a person must follow her own faith, personal beliefs ...
Page not found – Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice public_opinion.htm - 15kmaria-vai-com-as-outras, by the LACONIC MODE and prophetic interpretation means:- a kind of guideliness
negligence against the natural guidance, or; against the natural opinion";When the door is large, and largest [just like "beliefs"]
is the exact time to surge the dangerous tendence,Cause you know "beliefs" is not dangerous,I agree,Nevertheless, the tendence that bring up the anger of the Higher GEHAVH OF THE HOSTS,is the tendence in which the largest door of "belief" comes to be a passport to the largest doors of temples and cults for trading opportunities, with the saying:"let-us-go-mary-with-them-others-maries".....that were guided by the first unknown mary.

Whose was the garden? ** *. Mary, John and Peter Find the Tomb Empty. xx.
*-**. Did Mary go with the other women into the tomb? 1, 2, cf. Mark xvi. ...
errorpage.html J_W_McGarvey/class3/cn3john3.htm - 21k

Drow Semag,My message (16) was not about you, not even about any person that doesn't be a true defender of the sign or a representant for the doctrine of the sign. I respect you, and I should know better to respond in order to remain in the natural moderation. All your questions are welcome.Pleased to read you.

In order to respond,
With a Word I can get what I came for: יהוהNevertheless, no matter how long it takes to,
my whole origin, is the same of Peter - Petrus, that is "sphira petrus"; or, the kind of stone testified by ISAIAH (about Gerrutzsalm) - also testified by the lamb: "I will use this kind of stone in my New Gerrutzsalm"; or: "I'll use the kind of stone that you are".Also, my origin is the same of the apostle Paul,
I've seen the same celestial vision he has seen - in the body of a cherub angel,I've heard the same SEVEN SEALED eternal words he has heard.That's why I Know where is the ancient Ark of the Covenant,
And I've seen the eternal writing of the fingers that pierced when wrote SEVEN TIMES the tetragram on the Tables of the Testimony.And the tables were pierced across one side to other.[that's why the tables were written on both their sides; on the one side and on the other were they written]. * ** And the tables were the work of יהוהGEHAWH,
and the writing was the writing of my love יהוהGEHAWH,
and pierced were the tables.

Zsgeha Zsfira
You do realize that, mystical as you sound, it sounds as if you are claiming to be a vessel through which God speaks. Now I know that all of us Christians get a bit proud at times concerning our ability to interpret what we honestly believe to be gods wisdom....so I will ask you this: Do you think that you are communicating to this chat board on behalf of God? How do you feel about this big responsibility?

To whom belongs the big responsibility?Does it belongs to the corn grain?Or;Does it belongs to whom has planted the corn grain?[you perhaps might have the answer],And let me be nothing else than
a smallest corn grain,
that my love [ יהוה ] has projected and planted.
[I really feel like the grain]My MINISTAERIU is not to communicate,
Let the preachers do that; or, the Scripture only.My MINISTAERIU in the Eclipsed and Celestial,
is an inquisition of the inquirements,
as it is said:"Tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. **
Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they sea with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn again, and be healed.And if the corn grain comes to inquire on behalf of the Higher Eternal Being,
The Word is not mine, and the Instruction is not mine.Also, communicate the Truth on behalf of the Higher Eternal Being, is just what you are doing since you've been making the objective questions, always with good arguments.One of these evenings, I was alone crying my tears in my desert places, up my head and I saw the literal heaven with an only cloud near in front me, and a glistening cherub angel within.And when I saw that by the sign of the lamb [tighten hands up - the true imposition of hands] the eternal Name comes to be called upon,
I started to do it, and I have recept the Instruction that comes directly from the Seven Spirits that are within the lamb,
and the devouring fire has been in front me,
and seven glistening cherub angels have been my servants.And since I've been loving my love [ יהוה ],
I've got to loose my whole mind,
and I've lost my life, and I gave up my other I, and I gave up my sins [because Phrimmi (Spirit), the eternal flame is that quicken, flesh profit nothing].And if the matter is not the "I"; why should I say that the "I" is a great thing? Or; That the "I" is got a big responsibility within the self of myself? The truth is testified: "I" comes to die with the lamb. And the only "I" that shall be alive in me is not mine: Is the I of I AM - GE-I HAVH-AM.

OK Zsgeha Zsfira....You are quite eloquent in your passion. I have another question for you,then. The Title of this thread. In English, is that Christ Jesus 666 1,2,3,4,5,6,7?

The Title of this thread. In English, is that Christ Jesus 666 1,2,3,4,5,6,7?Answer: No, because if I have written Christ Jesus by Title of this thread, and not KRISTV IESVS [ancient rudimental romanian linguage], I would have led the topic to sinister and disasterous consequences, cause I couldn’t avoid the following 3 contradictions:1. phrimmi:first contradiction: I write Christ Jesus and simultaneously, in the book of Zsgeha Zsfira I’ve been told that according to the true origin, Pontfice Pilatos didn’t want to write a name, but words only in the Inscription INRI — I.e. sus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum — [Id.est.susppended].2. sequenti:second contradiction: I write Christ Jesus and simultaneously, in the book I’ve been told that according to the true origin, Pontfice Pilatos could never write (in the inscription) the true Eternal hebrew Name of the lamb, not even any other name, because his wife sent unto him saying:
Have thou nothing to do with that righteous man.He could never write the lamb’s true hebrew ETERNAL name — GEHV-—SHUA — I AM the SALVATION — because this name I AM is the true reason through which the high priest rent his clothes, and said: What need we any further witnesses? Ye have heard the blasphemy.Also he could never write any other name, neither to do just like the Vulghata-Vicious-Translation. He really has followed undirectly the councel of the Holy Spirit.3. trminus:third contradiction: I write Christ Jesus and simultaneously, in the book I’ve testified that according to the true origin, the words KRISTU IESUS or KRISTU IE-SUS are not a name, but just words only.. Mediatus:Immediate contradiction: I write Christ Jesus - when I’m not in need of combat the ministry that is an ordination established by my love [ יהוה ]. I just combat against the false masters only. If I know that my love has projected the leopard, and the lion, and the dragon, and the beasts; And if I understand that the powers and the potentates of beasts were established by my love [ יהוה ] just to devour the understanding of the wrong ones [kind of sheep that doesn’t listen to the lamb]; soon; (?) Why should I try to avoid their prosperity or their spiritual ministry? Verily, according to my love [ יהוה ], all the beasts, leopard, lions, dragon, beasts [in the mode of spiritual ordination and ministry], all of them are also under my command.Under my command: means Under the potentiality of the Verb that became flesh, and under the pronunciation of the eternal Verb when is pronounced also by me.

We are very puzzled![This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-09-2004]

While writing KRISTV IESVS (or kristu i.e.sus), I've never written through the mode of name, but "words only".Who has told that "while writing KRISTV IESVS" I was writing a name?I've always been writing IESUS or IE-SUS through the mode of "words only". [I.e.sus (Id.Est.Susppended)]Everyone who's got understanding knows that the word KRISTU (mode of substantive) is a greek substitute for REX (ancient romanian; also mode of substantive).Therefore kristu or KRISTU was, is, and will be forever,
just the greek inscription of REX.No matter how long the greeks have been using kristu through the mode of "name" for themselves.
Also, no matter the thousands of years they're doing it.LinguisticsSyntaxSyntax, for Bloomfield, was the study of free forms that were composed entirely of free forms. Central to his theory of syntax were the notions of form classes and constituent structure. (These notions were also relevant, though less central, in the theory of morphology.) Bloomfield defined form classes, rather imprecisely, in terms of some common "recognizable phonetic or grammatical feature" shared by all the members. He gave as examples the form class consisting of "personal substantive expressions" in English (defined as "the forms that, when spoken with exclamatory final pitch, are calls for a person's presence or attention"--e.g., "John," "Boy," "Mr. Smith"); the form class consisting of "infinitive expressions" (defined as "forms which, when spoken with exclamatory final pitch, have the meaning of a command"--e.g., "run," "jump," "come here"); the form class of "nominative substantive expressions" (e.g., "John," "the boys"); and so on. It should be clear from these examples that form classes are similar to, though not identical with, the traditional parts of speech and that one and the same form can belong to more than one form class.

"Written by Jones/Page/PlantThere is a train that leaves the station
heading for your destination,
But the price you pay to nowhere
has increased a dollar more"
*******The kind of train I mean, is kristu i.e.sus (words only),
Is a train that could be heading for the destination of "name",
That's the same destination (or; tendence) of cults and beliefs,
But I can't come in this train if I don't pay the price;And the price is: "to use my mouth, and my lips, just to say that KRISTV IESVS IS A NAME, and not words only".Is there anybody here remember where the following words are written?"And in their mouth was found no lie: they are without blemish.""KRISTV IESVS IS A NAME, and not words only": - Would I bet my life in it?Who would bet the life in it?Soon: let me pay a dollar more, please, and keep me out of this train that's is called "KRISTV IESVS ACCORDING TO RELIGION AND BELIEFS AND THEOLOGY, and according Vulgatha-Vicious-Translation".And If I should pay many dollars more, yes I would.Better than loose the life because of the liable-Legion-truths that the false masters like to worship.

How do you pronounce your name ?What does it mean?You seem to be mocking the giving of money.Giving is supposed to be a response to something recieved.People are turned off by misuse, which, is cured by right use. No ?

WT, If you can figure out what he is saying then you would be the first.

---

Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"