Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dating methods
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 2 of 10 (86777)
02-16-2004 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by miss smartie pants yes um
02-16-2004 8:46 PM


Can you really find out the age of something when you don't know what it has been through?
Well, we base a lot of dating on the radioactive decay rates of various elements. And we know those rates have been constant for about 2 billion years because of astronomical observation.
So I'd say radiometric dating is pretty accurate, when you follow the right procedure. Like any scientific test you get bad results if you do it wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by miss smartie pants yes um, posted 02-16-2004 8:46 PM miss smartie pants yes um has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by miss smartie pants yes um, posted 02-16-2004 8:56 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 4 of 10 (86786)
02-16-2004 9:14 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by miss smartie pants yes um
02-16-2004 8:56 PM


Next, how can you tell if you followed the "right procedure"?
You use multiple dating methods and multiple attempts. If your dates all converge, you know you did it right. If you did it wrong, you get divergent dates, because different methods give different errors if you do it wrong.
My guess is that you could "scientifically" figure it out, but never know the truth.
Well, you can't know the truth about if Nero or Lincoln existed, because you weren't there. On the other hand we can be as sure that our dates are correct as we can that Abraham Lincoln actually existed. That's good enough for me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by miss smartie pants yes um, posted 02-16-2004 8:56 PM miss smartie pants yes um has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by miss smartie pants yes um, posted 02-16-2004 9:19 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024