Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dating methods
miss smartie pants yes um
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 10 (86775)
02-16-2004 8:46 PM


So, based on scientific studies, which dating methods are or are not reliable? Can you really find out the age of something when you don't know what it has been through? Give me your thoughts. OH, and don't forget, everything you give me needs to backed up with sources to prove it. I look forward to seeing what you say...

Miss Smartie Pants Yes Um

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by crashfrog, posted 02-16-2004 8:50 PM miss smartie pants yes um has replied
 Message 6 by Coragyps, posted 02-16-2004 9:30 PM miss smartie pants yes um has not replied
 Message 8 by Loudmouth, posted 02-17-2004 2:44 PM miss smartie pants yes um has not replied
 Message 10 by mark24, posted 02-22-2004 11:55 AM miss smartie pants yes um has not replied

  
miss smartie pants yes um
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 10 (86778)
02-16-2004 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by crashfrog
02-16-2004 8:50 PM


First, have you personally ever dated something using the scientific procedure? Next, how can you tell if you followed the "right procedure"? It's like any experiment, you may think you correctly followed it, but didn't.
If there was an ice cube sitting in a small pool of water, could you tell me how long the ice cube was sitting there or how big it initially was? My guess is that you could "scientifically" figure it out, but never know the truth. Unless, of course, you were there when it was set out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by crashfrog, posted 02-16-2004 8:50 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 02-16-2004 9:14 PM miss smartie pants yes um has replied

  
miss smartie pants yes um
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 10 (86789)
02-16-2004 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by crashfrog
02-16-2004 9:14 PM


But can you really put it in the same time frame? Can you say that an ice cube the size of a 1in cube was there when something else happened, when for all you know, that ice cube may have been sitting there since it was a 1ft cube and also going through weather to get to the point where it was at now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 02-16-2004 9:14 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024