|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Right Side of the News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
Vox also deals with Faith’s argument.
Unite the Right was explicitly organized and branded as a far-right, racist, and white supremacist event by far-right racist white supremacists. This was clear for months before the march actually occurred. So by casting the rally instead as a sort of spontaneous outpouring from Confederate statue enthusiasts, Trump is rewriting history.
So by August 2017, when the Unite the Right rally was scheduled to take place, it was fairly clear that the organizers behind the rallies on behalf of keeping the Lee statue in place had a very specific ideological bent. That was clear in a police affidavit detailing who was expected at Unite the Right ” including roughly 250 to 500 Klansmen and more than 150 “Alt-Knights,” the military division of the Proud Boys.
In fact, going back through the promotional materials for Unite the Right, it is fascinating just how little the statue of Lee, or honoring Confederate veterans, seemed to matter to the organizers and attendees of Unite the Right, an event that, despite its name, had nothing to do with conservatism writ large.
The attendees of Unite the Right were crystal clear as to what the event was supposed to be ” not a show of support for history, but a “pro-white” activist event. Neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin described the upcoming Unite the Right rally as in a post on the neo-Nazi website the Daily Stormer on August 8, 2017:
quote: This is a transcript of the Trump interview in Faith’s video
TRUMP: I am not putting anybody on a moral plane, what I’m saying is this: you had a group on one side and a group on the other, and they came at each other with clubs and it was vicious and horrible and it was a horrible thing to watch, but there is another side. There was a group on this side, you can call them the left. You’ve just called them the left, that came violently attacking the other group. So you can say what you want, but that’s the way it is. REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides? TRUMP: I do think there is blame - yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don’t have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say. REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville. TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group - excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
And
No, no. There were people in that rally, and I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly, the taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people, neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call ’em. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest
As the article points out the protest the “night before” was a torchlit march, chanting slogans like “The Jews will not replace us” and the Nazi “Blood and soil”. The article concludes
We also have the transcript and video of how Trump responded. He did, indeed, refer to the people who attended Unite the Right, people who were likely well aware of and supportive of its messaging, as “very fine people,” and he downplayed the tiki torch parade as “people protesting very quietly.”
This was basically the point I was making but the article has a lot more detail and evidence - beyond what I’ve quoted here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: No. You just refuse to see the point. The fact is that Trump supported the Unite the Right protestors - and White Supremacy was the main point of their protest. Trump could not defend that protest without defending White Supremacists. That Trump tried to whitewash the protest - to the point of calling marchers chanting anti-Semitic and Nazi slogans a “very quiet” protest aimed at retaining the statue only emphasises the point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: And those people were White Supremacists there to attend a White Supremacist rally, with the statue a secondary issue.
quote: In other words Trump’s “perfect” answer confused the issue by talking about imaginary people. Perhaps you could explain how Trump could get it so wrong and why he’s still wrong, even now.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: I would hope that the President of the United States would be better informed - and willing to correct his misstatements instead of strongly endorsing them.
quote: Then he ought to know that the “very quiet” protest involved chanting anti-Semitic and Nazi slogans. I did. And the evidence is quite clear that “Unite the Right” was a White Supremacist rally, they were the people with the permits and if Trump confuses the issue - as you are claiming - by getting things badly wrong then he has a serious problem.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
But I am not changing the subject. You claim that Trump confused the issue by defending imaginary people. And presumably you are blaming right-wing media for Trump’s mistake when you say he got his ideas from TV coverage.
(Although Trump should certainly get a proper briefing from his staff instead of relying on any media before making public pronouncements.) If you offer a defence of Trump it is part of the discussion and you do not get to declare it off-limits by claiming that it is a “change of subject”.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: So when he talked about “very fine people on both sides” he knew that one of the sides was a White Supremacist rally ?
quote: Then how come he “saw” people chanting anti-Semitic and Nazi slogans as a “very peaceful” and not at all Nazi protest ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: If you get things wrong, it isn’t me who’s the “BLITHERING IDIOT” Trump said there were “very fine people on both sides”. One side was a White Supremacist rally. If he wasn’t talking about White Supremacists he can’t have been talking about anybody who existed, could he ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: I realise that rational argument is difficult for you but you really should try properly thinking about things instead of shouting abuse. If Trump was not referring to White Supremacists then - since the people actually on one side were attending a White Supremacist rally - he must be referring to people he imagined to exist. So you are the one claiming that Trump was talking about imaginary people. I guess that makes you the “BLITHERING IDIOT” for not even understanding your own excuses.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: Really ? How can you see that someone isn’t a White Supremacist?
quote: What definitions ? I think you mean the FACTS. Or at least the fact that one side was a White Supremacist rally.
quote: No, we are talking about the fact that the thoughts and beliefs you attribute to Trump are at odds with the reality of the situation in Charlottesville - and why that is the problem here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
Ah. Caliing us “cockroaches”. Where have I heard that before ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: He wasn’t exactly happy to see it ended.
quote: Those quotes are rather misleading. Here they are in context:
Several historians have noted the paradoxical nature of Lee's beliefs and actions concerning race and slavery. While Lee protested he had sympathetic feelings for blacks, they were subordinate to his own racial identity.[76] While Lee held slavery to be an evil institution, he also saw some benefit to blacks held in slavery.[77] While Lee helped assist individual slaves to freedom in Liberia, and provided for their emancipation in his own will,[78] he believed the enslaved should be eventually freed in a general way only at some unspecified future date as a part of God's purpose.[76] Slavery for Lee was a moral and religious issue, and not one that would yield to political solutions.[79] Emancipation would sooner come from Christian impulse among slave masters before "storms and tempests of fiery controversy" such as was occurring in "Bleeding Kansas".[76] Countering southerners who argued for slavery as a positive good, Lee in his well-known analysis of slavery from an 1856 letter called it a moral and political evil. While both Robert and his wife Mary Lee were disgusted with slavery, they also defended it against Abolitionist demands for immediate emancipation for all enslaved.[80] And a quote from the letter to provide more context for the second quote:
n this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any Country. It is useless to expatiate on its disadvantages. I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence.
quote: No, the American Civil War was primarily a fight between those wishing to preserve slavery versus those wishing to preserve the Union. And I note that you don’t seem interested in accurately presenting Lee’s views.
quote: Who says that I called him racist for his position on slavery? This is the real reason:
Lee accepted "the extinction of slavery" provided for by the Thirteenth Amendment, but publicly opposed racial equality and granting African Americans the right to vote and other political rights.
But I guess you don’t care about that,
quote: Loving your country doesn’t mean loving every prominent person in its history.
quote: In other words you agree - you think that racists become “very fine people” if they stand up for the statue of a racist who fought for slavery. Edited by PaulK, : No reason given. Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: I wasn’t talking about Trump - in that post. But the people attending the Unite the Right event were racists and if Trump wasn’t defending them, who was he defending ? Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: See Message 1434 and your reply Message 1435 And let us note that there is still no evidence of any substantial grouping of “non-White-Supremacists” at the Unite the Right rally, nor even a good reason why such people would want to attend a White Supremacist event.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: That is a diversion from the point. The point is that you called me a “LYING CREEP” - twice in a two-sentence post - for saying that there was no such group. So far from you “getting angry at all the lies” you get angry and call people liars for saying things you don’t like.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: Thank you for surprising me. Perhaps you could get around to apologising for all the other similar instances in this thread. And a general apology for the many past incidents.
quote: Since I haven’t done that - certainly not knowingly - I don’t think you should do that either.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024