Author
|
Topic: Assumptions involved in scientific dating
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 117 of 222 (827389)
01-23-2018 1:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 113 by Taq 01-23-2018 12:56 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
Lies? Be more specific. Who lied about what?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 113 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 12:56 PM | | Taq has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 120 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 1:08 PM | | DOCJ has replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 119 of 222 (827391)
01-23-2018 1:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 111 by Taq 01-23-2018 12:43 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
I made a claim and provided a link to a source... Lol. Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
This message is a reply to: | | Message 111 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 12:43 PM | | Taq has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 121 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 1:09 PM | | DOCJ has replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 122 of 222 (827394)
01-23-2018 1:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 108 by Percy 01-23-2018 11:41 AM
|
|
Re: Questions
I meant quantify as is posted. I made a claim and referenced a link as a source. Still waiting on the response. It does seem like all of you haven't researched the source. I'll respond to your other post ASAP Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
This message is a reply to: | | Message 108 by Percy, posted 01-23-2018 11:41 AM | | Percy has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 129 by Percy, posted 01-23-2018 2:54 PM | | DOCJ has replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 123 of 222 (827395)
01-23-2018 1:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 121 by Taq 01-23-2018 1:09 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
You need to research the source.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 121 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 1:09 PM | | Taq has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 125 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 1:22 PM | | DOCJ has replied | | Message 128 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 2:32 PM | | DOCJ has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 124 of 222 (827396)
01-23-2018 1:22 PM
|
Reply to: Message 106 by Percy 01-23-2018 11:34 AM
|
|
Re: Questions
I'm guessing you need coffee, then go research the source.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 106 by Percy, posted 01-23-2018 11:34 AM | | Percy has seen this message but not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 126 of 222 (827398)
01-23-2018 1:30 PM
|
Reply to: Message 107 by Stile 01-23-2018 11:36 AM
|
|
Re: Questions
My point was dating methods are disputed within the scientific community. Links provided... Lol.. Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
This message is a reply to: | | Message 107 by Stile, posted 01-23-2018 11:36 AM | | Stile has seen this message but not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 127 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 2:32 PM | | DOCJ has replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 130 of 222 (827403)
01-23-2018 3:39 PM
|
Reply to: Message 118 by Taq 01-23-2018 1:06 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
It's not difficult to understand or post that dating methods are being disputed in the science community. It is equally a simple matter to reference. Links have been provided. Edited by DOCJ, : 🤣
This message is a reply to: | | Message 118 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 1:06 PM | | Taq has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 134 by Coyote, posted 01-23-2018 4:53 PM | | DOCJ has replied | | Message 140 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 5:15 PM | | DOCJ has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 131 of 222 (827404)
01-23-2018 3:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 129 by Percy 01-23-2018 2:54 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
It was a metaphor... Dating methods are being disputed in the science community. Links provided. There is absolutely nothing else needed to be posted. I've mastered the claim. Lol..
This message is a reply to: | | Message 129 by Percy, posted 01-23-2018 2:54 PM | | Percy has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 146 by Percy, posted 01-24-2018 8:34 AM | | DOCJ has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 132 of 222 (827405)
01-23-2018 3:54 PM
|
Reply to: Message 127 by Taq 01-23-2018 2:32 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
The Science community is ANYONE practicing Science. LOL. You don't get to control what is and what is not science. As long as they are making observations, formulating ideas based on observations, testing their ideas, making predictions, and presenting their conclusions before a group of peers to have others repeat their claim, or attempt to falsify their claim, it is the science community.. I know you would just LOVE it if you could pick and choose based on your feelings but that is not science. Edited by DOCJ, : 🤣
This message is a reply to: | | Message 127 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 2:32 PM | | Taq has replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 135 of 222 (827411)
01-23-2018 5:03 PM
|
Reply to: Message 125 by Taq 01-23-2018 1:22 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
Um I made a claim provided the data. Done.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 125 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 1:22 PM | | Taq has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 137 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 5:11 PM | | DOCJ has not replied | | Message 142 by JonF, posted 01-23-2018 5:45 PM | | DOCJ has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 136 of 222 (827412)
01-23-2018 5:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 134 by Coyote 01-23-2018 4:53 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
Prove your claim and fyi the EU is not a group of religious zealots, they are evolutionists.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 134 by Coyote, posted 01-23-2018 4:53 PM | | Coyote has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 138 by Taq, posted 01-23-2018 5:12 PM | | DOCJ has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 157 of 222 (827562)
01-27-2018 10:37 PM
|
Reply to: Message 133 by Coyote 01-23-2018 4:48 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
You need to read the previous post.. I was being facetious. Lol.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 133 by Coyote, posted 01-23-2018 4:48 PM | | Coyote has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 158 of 222 (827563)
01-27-2018 10:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 156 by caffeine 01-26-2018 8:06 AM
|
|
Re: Questions
The EU, Answers in Genesis, Reasons to Believe, and other organizations have scientist working for them. Where they publish may be important to some but not to everyone. And what they publish is the gravity of importance NOT where they publish (yes peers need to be able to review it obviously). The peer review practice is obvious piece of the practice of publishing in order to draw attention but also to provide feedback. If you actually look into any of the organizations noted they all have conferences, peer reviews etc substantiating and arguing claims. The EU is 1 of the many organizations (not actually an organization but it is organized with many PhD holding scientists such as the late Halton Arp) with peer review. Some here seem to only pay attention to conventional gravitational based sciences. I'm pointing out in the world of science which is not limited to conventional Science, all dating practices from chemical to using redshift are disputed. It is NOT just creationist argument and ideas, it is also others within the scientific community like the EU. Keep in mind the EU is evolutionist generally such as Walton Thornhill (disputing dating), reasons to believe is creationist (supporting) such as Hugh Ross but they support dating methods. So you have evolutionist in EU disputing dating methods and you have creationist supporting them... Edited by DOCJ, : 🤔 Edited by DOCJ, : 🤔 Edited by DOCJ, : 🤣
This message is a reply to: | | Message 156 by caffeine, posted 01-26-2018 8:06 AM | | caffeine has not replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 159 of 222 (827564)
01-27-2018 11:11 PM
|
Reply to: Message 154 by Taq 01-25-2018 11:47 AM
|
|
Re: his really stupid "Questions"
How do geologists calculate the amount of the parent/and daughter chemicals in the Rock at creation? They just presume the daughter was the p and suggest it decayed ? I would think that is overly simplified. I wouldn't be able to presume a rock over billions of years had didn't have contamination or didn't change over all that time... Or that 0 daughter was present at creation. We don't even have a good understanding of the universe without doubts. Where it actually came from without doubts.. How it is actually functioning without doubts.. We don't actually know space has an ability to be curved without doubts.. atmospheric refraction can explain light traveling around a planet, or intrinsic properties can explain star light.. Edited by DOCJ, : 🤔 Edited by DOCJ, : Er Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
This message is a reply to: | | Message 154 by Taq, posted 01-25-2018 11:47 AM | | Taq has replied |
|
DOCJ
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 161 of 222 (827566)
01-27-2018 11:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 160 by NoNukes 01-27-2018 11:34 PM
|
|
Re: Questions
Please refer to my previous post before responding.. you wasted your time. 1 comment, Halton Arp showed red shift does not point to Inflation, distance, etc. This does effect dating. He is 1 tiny example. My main point is in the scientific community these issues including chemical dating are being debated.
Arp Edited by DOCJ, : Link
This message is a reply to: | | Message 160 by NoNukes, posted 01-27-2018 11:34 PM | | NoNukes has replied |
|