DOCJ writes:
The Science community is ANYONE practicing Science. LOL.
Well sort of, but not really.
The science community is made up of scientists practicing science, but there's a concensus amongst scientists in any field about the state of the art in that specialism at any one time.
And much of science is settled, not in any substantive doubt. This is the case in the stuff you're blustering about.
Also, at any one time there are nutters, weirdos, conspiracy theorists, religious zealots, hobbyists and amateurs doing science, or something like it. The test of whether they're actually doing real science is whether their work stands up to other scientists analysis of their work.
Now I know nothing of which you speak but I do know that it's outwith the scientific concensus and well inside nutter territory, so you have an uphill struggle - you have to convince.
If you're hoping to convince, you have to explain. Providing bare links to videos is not convincing. Providing single sentence responses is not not convincing. Putting LOL at the end of a sentence is not convincing.
If you want to convince us, tell us the story and provide real evidence. Demonstrate the science that you claim you have.
Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona
"Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.