Zealot,
Hi, from what I could gather, Darwin used the fossil record as evidence originally of evolution. I think he spent something like 27 years perfecting it (but I read that on some Christian site, so I cant verify it as unbias information). From what I've gathered, Darwin's original ToE has had its revisions and alterations to suit the evidence more, am I correct ?
Yes, on both counts.
My point was that if A,B,C,D,E,F,H,I point to evolution and 'G' does not point to evolution, then there would be an evolutionary theory to explain 'G' and thus 'G' would fit in with the rest of the alphabet and the ToE.
I agree completely. But all the evidence has to be within the same logical framework. That is; the falsifying evidence has to be 1/ logically valid, & 2/ Actually has to directly contradict the theory.
This is why fossil gaps don't falsify evolution. They aren't evidence at all, any argument based upon them against evolution is an argument from ignorance, because fossils haven't been found, they don't exist.
Mark
------------------
"I can't prove creationism, but they can't prove evolution. It is [also] a religion,
so it should not be taught....Christians took over the school board and voted in creationism. That can be done in any school district anywhere, and
it ought to be done." Says Kent "consistent" Hovind in "Unmasking the False Religion of Evolution Chapter 6."
[This message has been edited by mark24, 08-27-2003]
[This message has been edited by mark24, 08-27-2003]