Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dishonesty and ID
Cravingjava
Guest


Message 3 of 37 (7851)
03-26-2002 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Joe Meert
03-26-2002 12:24 AM


Yes,it is interesting. Makes ya wonder why evolutionists are so afraid to have the "controversy" taught in school.
http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?program=CRSC&command=view&id=1128

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Joe Meert, posted 03-26-2002 12:24 AM Joe Meert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by nator, posted 03-29-2002 7:49 AM You have not replied
 Message 17 by Quetzal, posted 04-14-2002 11:24 AM You have not replied

     
Cravingjava
Guest


Message 4 of 37 (7853)
03-26-2002 1:21 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by The Barbarian
03-26-2002 1:01 AM


quote:
Originally posted by The Barbarian:
They say that they aren't creationists. But you wouldn't know it by their ethics.
I am curious, but do all anti-ID'ers use character attacks to defend their otherwise weak position in the controversy? Also, are all evolutionists ignorant of the fact that there is a very distinct difference between "creationist" vs "ID'er"?
Since you are on the topic of ethics...
http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?program=CRSC%20Responses&command=view&id=1106

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by The Barbarian, posted 03-26-2002 1:01 AM The Barbarian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Joe Meert, posted 03-26-2002 1:26 AM You replied
 Message 9 by Joe Meert, posted 03-26-2002 8:31 AM You have not replied

     
Cravingjava
Guest


Message 6 of 37 (7855)
03-26-2002 1:39 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Joe Meert
03-26-2002 1:26 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Joe Meert:
JM: Actually, they are not all that different at all. This was part of the point of my original post. ID is simply an old creationist idea dressed up in new (albeit see-through) clothes. There is no good science behind the argument insofaras biology is concerned. The whole point of ID is to get religion back into the classroom disguised as science.
Cheers
Joe Meert
[This message has been edited by Joe Meert, 03-26-2002]

Joe,
Thanks for confirming that it is true that most evolutionists don't even understand the platform they so diligently oppose. Hehe.
http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?program=CRSC&command=view&id=121

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Joe Meert, posted 03-26-2002 1:26 AM Joe Meert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Peter, posted 03-26-2002 5:17 AM You have not replied
 Message 11 by Caerbannog, posted 03-29-2002 12:17 AM You have not replied

     
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024