If I live in a city (or a small town), then I worry about cancer, heart disease, and the 30,000 Americans who die in automobile crashes every year.
And yet I've seen that you post on topics completely unrelated to any of those concerns. For example you've posted in this very forum regarding Lamarkian biology theories. How do you have the gall to post on something other than the top two or three most important topics?
Seriously, what is the purpose of objecting to what other people choose to discuss. Is your own view of the universe so superior that you can to dictate priorities for everyone else? Perhaps some black people have good reasons for having a list of priorities that differs from yours.
I am outraged by that stigmatization and think that all kids should have the constitutional right to have an ERASURE LAW which expunges their "mental records" from existence.
I think we can answer the question about whether or not you are objective. You object therefore you are objective.
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King
If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams