|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Entitlements - what's so bad about them? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
The stock market is another great example ... Indeed, and the Randroids (nice name btw) scream that the Fed is printing money, while the stock market prints much more imaginary value in the stocks and bonds that are sold and repackaged and resold. It's all a paper house of cards that comes tumbling down with the slightest rumble at the base ... by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
Sadly, Coyote actually 'thinks' North Korea is a prime example of a system that has all the classic benchmarks of communism like: common ownership, absence of classes, and where decisions are made collectively. Coyote's 'thinking' is akin to what creationists unilaterally construct in their little minds about atheists. Yes, and there are several very successful socialist democracies in Europe where they have balanced capitalism with socialism to the benefit of all their citizens. So we know the lies of Faux Noise and the Teabilly crowd are lies they fool themselves with, not ones that fool those of us with open eyes. People are entitled to a fair shake, to an even playing ground, to respect and to just treatment -- it is their basic human right to have these. by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
If we were a nation where 50% of the nation were starving, and the other 50% barely had enough to eat, then it would be foolish to be talking of entitlements.
We can talk about entitlements because of our wealth as a country as a whole. There is way more than enough wealth in this country to fund programs that provide a basic safety net and basic services. In my opinion, it would be immoral not to have these programs. How is it moral to not have a food stamp program when we are paying farmers billions of dollars NOT to grow food? How is it moral to have a health care system where a hard working father has to choose between death and bankrupting his family? How is it moral to work hard your entire life and not be able to live out your last years with dignity and without burdening your family? How is it moral to give up all of these things so that billionaires can pay a lower tax rate?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 7.0 |
Coyote regurgitates:
Another way of looking at it is: "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money [to spend]." That was from Margaret Thatcher. This is a foul way to view our country. I'd say "The problem with unregulated capitalism is that eventually we run out of our own money [to spend]." Any kind of totalitarian pressure does this.- xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2136 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
With all the comments and all the "likes" to those comments, I am really getting the impression that many of you folks feel you have a right to commandeer assets from anyone you choose "for the public good."
Is there no limit to your greed for seizing the assets of others? Are there no limits to the excuses you can come up with to justify seizing the assets of others? But you should ask yourselves, "What happens when there are no more assets to seize?" Your whole system of existence requires someone who is productive from whom you can expropriate wealth. What happens when those productive individuals decide not to play your game any longer? What do you do then? Remember the tale of the Golden Goose?Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge. Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1 "Multiculturalism" does not include the American culture. That is what it is against.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 7.0 |
No. It's about shared patriotism.
- xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 96 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined:
|
Is there any nation that has succesfully implemented the sort of economic system you are advocating? If so where?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dronestar Member Posts: 1417 From: usa Joined: Member Rating: 7.0
|
quote: That you would attempt to spin the greed label on the poor and middle class by writing . . .
Coyote writes: Is there no limit to your greed for seizing the assets of others? makes you a major dick. http://thinkprogress.org/.../top-five-wealthiest-one-percent
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
With all the comments and all the "likes" to those comments, I am really getting the impression that many of you folks feel you have a right to commandeer assets from anyone you choose "for the public good." Wrong, it is about recovering assets from those who have commandeered them for personal aggrandizement. Workers should get a fair and just compensation for their work, not sub-poverty wages and marked down hours.
Is there no limit to your greed for seizing the assets of others? Are there no limits to the excuses you can come up with to justify seizing the assets of others? The real question is who is the proper owner of the assets, the one who steals from the workers or the workers that created the assets?
But you should ask yourselves, "What happens when there are no more assets to seize?" The economy is made from the movement of money\assets, not by the having of money\assets: the more money\assets are moved the better the economy is. You should ask yourself "What happens when all the assets are in the hands of the few?" Who is seizing the assets then? Who will buy anything when they have no money? All money is, dear coyote, is a marker, and IOU, a piece of paper with an agreed upon value (and that agreed on value can change): it represents value, but what is the basis of the value?
Your whole system of existence requires someone who is productive from whom you can expropriate wealth. ... Wrong again. It requires that those who do the actual production share in the benefits of that production, rather than having it be expropriated by robber bosses who think they are somehow entitled to richness because they have the power to steal from the employees. It also requires that those that benefit from an economic system pay their share for the maintenance of that economic system -- a user fee if you will
... What happens when those productive individuals decide not to play your game any longer? What do you do then? Production is absolutely no good without consumers, and consumers cannot buy without funds, and they can't get funds unless they are properly compensated for work they do. Ten people with a dollar each and something to sell is a better economy than ten people with one person having 10 dollars who has all the assets to sell. If selfish "producers" take all the money out of the system there will be no "game" ... and what happens when the workers decide not to play their game any longer? They go work elsewhere and spend money elsewhere -- what happens to your precious producers then? "Producers" are not magic people that are somehow better than other people, especially when you look under the covers.
Remember the tale of the Golden Goose? Yes, the greedy owner wanted more gold so he ruined the factory that actually produced it, shut it down, cut up the machinery, and laid off the workers ... ... what's your point? Edited by RAZD, : No reason given. Edited by RAZD, : ..by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3992 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 7.5
|
Coyote writes: Is there no limit to your greed for seizing the assets of others? Are there no limits to the excuses you can come up with to justify seizing the assets of others? But you should ask yourselves, "What happens when there are no more assets to seize?" Your whole system of existence requires someone who is productive from whom you can expropriate wealth. What happens when those productive individuals decide not to play your game any longer? What do you do then? Remember the tale of the Golden Goose? Is there no limit to your appetite for paraphrasing a slogan over and over in preference to reasoned responses? I don't understand how you can discuss science like a scientist but rant at policy differences like someone leading a Luddite mob. By the way, the Killer of the Golden Goose Award would better go to the corporate/financial elite who savaged the global economy. If the wealthiest 1% were to "go Galt" because they resented taxes being returned to historical levels (the levels that made the U.S. a preeminently prosperous and powerful nation), the rest of us would do just fine. Don't confuse the wealthiest 1% with the smartest, most talented, or hardest working 1%."If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
I don't understand how you can discuss science like a scientist but rant at policy differences like someone leading a Luddite mob. I've often wondered the same thing. My answer is that political beliefs seem to be as irrational as religious beliefs. It seems that more than half of the population makes a habit of supporting political sides that are seemingly against own national interests. For example minorities are seemingly more socially conservative than is typical, yet those feelings don't cause them to vote republican in any significant numbers. Similarly, the poorest states in our country are happy to support the republicans who place GM and Exxon's interests ahead of theirs every chance they get. I spent some time last night trying to figure out to much spreading around of wealth to the masses resulted in what happened to North Korea, but I gave up once the effort as impossible. And there's not much point in asking for an explanation because Coyote rarely gives one. Coyote's as smart as anyone here, but he cites mediocre fiction when it is time to illustrate his political beliefs. Impossible to understand. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
With all the comments and all the "likes" to those comments, I am really getting the impression that many of you folks feel you have a right to commandeer assets from anyone you choose "for the public good." Basic services and programs can be funded without having the rich become middle class like you and I.
Is there no limit to your greed for seizing the assets of others? You do understand the irony of this statement, do you not?
Your whole system of existence requires someone who is productive from whom you can expropriate wealth. What happens when those productive individuals decide not to play your game any longer? What do you do then? It helps if companies aren't rewarded with wealth by cutting wages and shipping jobs overseas. You talk about greed. It cuts both ways. All we are asking for is an economy that is fair for everyone, and a government that is able to provide basic services for all people. We have nothing against people getting rich. What we are against is an economy that serves the uber rich at the expense of the middle class.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
... Similarly, the poorest states in our country are happy to support the republicans who place GM and Exxon's interests ahead of theirs every chance they get. Anyone not in the top 5% should not be voting republican if they want their concerns noted. Anyone who does is wearing a "kick me" sign. Vote libertarian or independent if you can't stomach voting for the conservative democrats ... (Obama and Clinton are to the right of Reagan, and at least are concerned with fiscal responsibility). by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
marc9000 Member Posts: 1522 From: Ky U.S. Joined: Member Rating: 1.4 |
Hi RAZD, it's always interesting to see non-creationists discuss politics!
RAZD writes: quote: The congress has the power to enforce basic human rights (promote the general welfare) and to fund them (power to lay and collect taxes). When referencing the "general welfare" clause, it's important to note "the intent of the framers" concerning it.
quote: Walter Williams On The General Welfare Clause of the Constitution.
RAZD writes: quote: Is the pursuit of happiness an entitlement, a right, or both? If you want to know the intent of the framers, the pursuit of it is both an entitlement and a right, but an achievement of it is NEITHER a right nor an entitlement. Excluding a few posters in this thread who put fourth no clear overall political position, non-creationist liberals outnumber non-creationist conservatives by about 13 to 1 in this thread. From about everything I've seen and read throughout news reporting and political commentary over many years, that seems to be a pretty predictable ratio. Yet it's far different ratio than that of the population at large of course, it's much closer to 50/50 there. Can I ask a few innocent, thoughtful questions without being flamed and called names? Probably not, but addressing them would probably be more fruitful than just another one-sided political thread.
What do you think is the reason that non-creationists tend to be liberal? Is is due more to lack of religious belief, or to scientific discoveries? Coyote is not religious and is interested in science, what do you think he's missing?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
What do you think is the reason that non-creationists tend to be liberal? Is is due more to lack of religious belief, or to scientific discoveries? Neither, I would think. I don't see any evidence that studying science makes you liberal. I think it more likely that people with liberal mindsets gravitate towards science and away from creationist beliefs. There is also the fact that people have defined science based mindsets as liberal. There is also the issue that science generally requires a type of boundary pushing and questioning that seems incompatible with creationism. Many creationist seem to have no use for huge chunks of science, yet some scientific topics seem, to me at least, to be gateways into interest in science in general. And of course, once you've screened out a bunch of creationists you are going to screen out a bunch of at least one type of conservative.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024