Proposed Rules for Debates

"shotgun fallacy"Making stuff up now, are we?Providing too many arguments is not a fallacy. And in a written debate, there is always an opportunity to respond over time. This is not like a timed debate where it is possible to chew up the time of the other side.When there is lots of evidence for one side, and none for the other, the debate is going to look one sided. That cannot be helped.

Shotgun argumentation may be a problem, but is it a logical fallacy?Only if we count the victor as the person with the most text or who gets the last word. But there is nothing fallacious about offering a large number of valid arguments and evidence.And that is particularly true if the other side claims you have no evidence.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.