Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwin on the Savage races
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 6 of 114 (718251)
02-05-2014 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jaf
02-05-2014 6:46 PM


Rather non PC but since it's science might I ask how potentially modern day members of the savage races who survived Darwin's fascist racist blatherings particularly evolutionists, feel about this?
They are not fascist thoughts. I feel the same about Darwin's racism as I do about Lincoln's racism. But I'm not an aboriginal Australian or Colombian tribesman. I'm not sure if we have any regular posters of that sort either.
Further more might I ask why musings like this are not equally mocked as wistful fables?
Its not a fable. Victorian writers had a peculiar style of their own and a bit of wistfulness was quite normal I believe. He's just saying he'd rather think of himself descended from monkeys of high character than humans of low character.
He doesn't spend long on this before quickly adding 'But we are not here concerned with hopes or fears, only with the truth as far as our reason permits us to discover it; and I have given the evidence to the best of my ability.'

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jaf, posted 02-05-2014 6:46 PM Jaf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Jaf, posted 02-05-2014 8:21 PM Modulous has replied

Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 16 of 114 (718264)
02-05-2014 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Jaf
02-05-2014 8:21 PM


Hitler allegedly was a big fan of Darwin's clearly racist views in that he was able to "scientifically supported" exterminate the "sub human" Jew in the aid of furthering evolution with the full support of Darwin's "science".
Who alleges it? And I bet I can make a stronger case that Houston Chamberlains German nationalistic work in Die Grundlagen had more influence on Hitler than anything Darwin said.
Hitler believed in the immutability of the species. 'The fox remains always a fox, the goose remains a goose, and the tiger will retain the character of a tiger.' he said, so it's clear that while they may have superficially agreed on some things (and I see no reason to see Darwin agreeing with Hitler about the necessity for the Aryan race to eradicate the world of Jews), they disagreed more fundamentally on others.
And how does that make Darwin's comments fascist?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Jaf, posted 02-05-2014 8:21 PM Jaf has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024