You can doubt evolution as much or as little as you like and precisely nobody is going to give the tiniest sliver of a shit.
Except that you do and obviously can't contain your anger.
This is an informal discussion forum not a peer reviewed journal.
I look forward not very excitedly for the occasion when you present an argument on the issue as opposed to ad hominem. Accusing people of ignorance does not replace an argument.
It sounds more like you want to stifle argument for you own dogma. Sad.
I presented two bits of evidence for my case here one undermining the strength of the claim for a falsifiability phylogenetic tree and the other casting doubts on the provability of claims of pseudogenes (which are an integral part of the claim for consillience).
Do you intend to debate that or just be insulting? I think I have my answer for that.