Summations Only

As Hoyle was a physicist and astronomer rather than a biochemist, his assertions on protein assembly could be called into question. He certainly didn't understand the combined working tenets of random mutation acted upon by non-random natural selection......otherwise he wouldn't have come up with your statement (which you don't source) nor his famous 'Hoyle's Fallacy (AKA 'Junkyard tornado' - Link to Wiki article ) which only goes to illustrate that Hoyle hadn't got a handle on the ToE.Next !

Hi Dwise1I love your amazingly detailed descriptions of the creationist position in the 80's and beyond. The conversion stories are moving - and also sad - all that wasted energy that could have gone to better use! And who knows the personal angst so many must have gone through on finding their creationist masters had lied to them - all so the great money machine could continue!The con runs so deep - from the working class people conned by the shiny-suited televangelists, to those deluded holders of a 'diploma-mill' degree, who doubtless have thought they have worked hard and deserved their accreditation.I don't know about 'foolish atheists' - but 'foolish creationists' seem ten a penny (as we say in Yorkshire, England)!