Your post seems to be just pretty much word salad, nonsense and yet again, misrepresentation of my position and beliefs. Please, if you are totally ignorant about what someone believes, ask them.
But then you go on to present five possible scenarios. Each is equally valid, but there really is only evidence that supports one, the last option.
[quote][list=1,R]
Only the spiritual truly exists, while the natural is merely an illusion.
The spiritual and the natural exist both equally true, with the spiritual being the source, ruler, and savior of both the spiritual and the natural.
The spiritual and the natural exist mutually exclusive, but both equally true, and exist unrelated and uninteracting, and perhaps contradictory.
The spiritual and the natural exist both equally true, with the natural being the source, ruler, and savior of both the natural and the spiritual.
Only the natural truly exists, while the spiritual is only a figment of the imagination of man.
[/list=1,R][/quote]
But wait, it gets even worse.
You never present any evidence in support of any of the positions, or even really discuss any of the positions.
Is there any wonder why thinking people find the product you try to market uninviting, uninteresting and irrelevant?
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin one
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
™ Version 4.2
