slevesque writes:
Well, again, the topic was the eye, and whether Richard Dawkins thinks it happened "by accident". Clearly he thinks that the filter of selection is strong enough to produce the eye; consequently, he does not think that the eye is accidental.
I hear you, but your changing the goalpost. My remark was concerning Nwr's OP, which in turn was in reply to Bolder-dash's statement that evolution as a whole is a random process.
If you look at all the lifeforms that have existed, which one would you say was a desired product?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
™ Version 4.2
