Robert Byers writes:
First time (in a long time) poster here.
Welcome back then.
I think I'm on thread.
Did you mean on topic?
As a YEC creationist I would say there is not anatomical remnants or parts showing previous body types whatsoever.
Ok.
Where there is then it is evidence of a previous body type. like in marine mammals or snakes.
What is it? "[no] anatomical remnants or parts showing previous body types whatsoever" or "Where there [are anatomical remnants or parts] then it is evidence of a previous body type". It would help if you wouldn't contradict yourself.
Yet despite the claim of evolution of everything having been something else great numbers of times there is few, repeat few, creatures with anatomical evidence of those previous bodies.
Not even 1%.
How did you determine this number? Show your work please.
This would be impossible if evolution was true.
Why?
Further its only a interpretation that present body parts are from previous body parts doing other things. Its not evident they are anything else but what they are for now.
They aren't. Of course, they were different in the past.
Imagine how it should be if evolution was true.
I don't have to imagine, I can look outside.
every creature would have bits and pieces of previous body types galore.
No, it wouldn't. You don't know what evolution says, do you?
In fact evolution indirectly admits this by using marine mammals, like whales, to demonstrate evolutionary change. They point at vestigial parts and say aha evolution proved.
Yet in fact they prove the opposite.
Marine mammals are special cases of quick adaptation.
Show that it was indeed "quick". And what you call "adaptation", scientists call evolution.