Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Unfairness and monkeys
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 1 of 8 (58578)
09-29-2003 4:35 PM


I'm putting this in Human Origins because I thought it was an interesting insight on our distant cousins the capuchin monkeys acting just like kindergarten kids ( or adult humans in the American workplace....). There's an article from Emory University by Sarah Brosnan and F.M.B. DeWaal - Nature 425, 297 - 299 (18 September 2003) titled "Monkeys reject unequal pay."
The abstract, references omitted:
During the evolution of cooperation it may have become critical for individuals to compare their own efforts and pay-offs with those of others. Negative reactions may occur when expectations are violated. One theory proposes that aversion to inequity can explain human cooperation within the bounds of the rational choice model1, and may in fact be more inclusive than previous explanation. Although there exists substantial cultural variation in its particulars, this 'sense of fairness' is probably a human universal that has been shown to prevail in a wide variety of circumstances. However, we are not the only cooperative animals, hence inequity aversion may not be uniquely human. Many highly cooperative nonhuman species seem guided by a set of expectations about the outcome of cooperation and the division of resources. Here we demonstrate that a nonhuman primate, the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella), responds negatively to unequal reward distribution in exchanges with a human experimenter. Monkeys refused to participate if they witnessed a conspecific obtain a more attractive reward for equal effort, an effect amplified if the partner received such a reward without any effort at all. These reactions support an early evolutionary origin of inequity aversion.
Specifically, the experimenter had two monkeys in full view of each other in adjacent cages. The monkeys were already used to a task where they would exchange a token - a small rock - for a treat. Monkey A would trade rocks for slices of cucumber all day, except when the experimenter gave Monkey B a grape for its token, and then tried to foist off a cucumber slice on Monkey A. A would then typically either refuse to offer the token, refuse to take the cuke, or throw the "inferior" treat away.
All the control conditions appear to me to be tested in this study. It beats me if there's really much to discuss, but it sure looks to me like one more anthropocentrism trashed - we're not the only critter that will pout and sulk when it's "no fair."
[This message has been edited by Coragyps, 09-29-2003]

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Rei, posted 09-29-2003 4:54 PM Coragyps has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 3 of 8 (58593)
09-29-2003 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Rei
09-29-2003 4:54 PM


hooker chimps?!
So the world's oldest profession is even older yet?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Rei, posted 09-29-2003 4:54 PM Rei has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by BellaSanta, posted 10-08-2003 11:04 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024