quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
There has been some discussion on what you would consider a Fact, and it seems that it is, I ask the more of specifics on what they would call a fact, that it resembles the relevance of a theory rather than a factoid. What is the definition and views on the differences of fact and theory?
Personally I would have thought this was a pretty simple question.
A THEORY is an explanation for the existence of a number of observable
phenomena (FACTS).
Evolution IS a theory ... not a fact. No matter how many observations
of the world support it, it will always be a theory. Evolutionary theory attempts to explain the diversity of life on earth, and as
Darwin's title says the origin of species.
A belief (no matter where it comes from) is NOT fact.
I believe that Evolution is a feasible, well supported explanaiton
for the diversity of life on earth. This is because it plausibly
explains many FACTS which can be observed.
What facts? A couple would be:
Anatomical similarities between ALL vertebrates.
The fossil record (whatever you believe about it fossils DO exist).
I'm not arguing what those facts are at the moment, I'm discussing the nature of FACT and THEORY.