Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ignore Feature
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3269 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 12 of 19 (528308)
10-05-2009 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Admin
10-05-2009 10:39 AM


I'm disinclined to like an "ignore feature" for a couple of reasons. As stated above, it lets users stop listening to anyone they disagree with, thereby stopping debate cold, and as this site is all about debate, it seems counterintuitive.
On the otherside, if someone registers and starts prosyletizing, I may be very inclined to ignore them, but if they're truly able to understand their mistake and begin evolving into a better debater, I've cut myself off from their better arguments. Based on what others are saying, I may be able to realize they've gotten better and "unignore" them, but for an ignore feature to really work, I would think it would also ignore responses to someone you've ignored...or am I wrong there?
Basically, how would I know if someone's gotten better and deserves to be listened to if I can't see what they're doing? There are a few posters here, I won't name names without a bribe, that I just skip over. I read the responses to them, however, and if I see a promising line of discussion, I'll go back and read the original post. This could be difficult to do, ignoring and unignoring the same person over and over.
Anyway, just my 2 cents.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Admin, posted 10-05-2009 10:39 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3269 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 13 of 19 (528309)
10-05-2009 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Admin
10-05-2009 1:48 PM


For those who expressed skepticism that an ignore feature would be appropriate for EvC, while I would definitely test it here, I would also listen to the membership regarding its becoming permanently enabled.
Can you enable it only for certain fora? For instance, you could enable it in the coffeehouse, book nook, and free-for-all fora that are great and fun, but aren't exactly the most heavily moderated, making it an ideal test-bed for the feature without bringing damnation to the actual debate threads.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Admin, posted 10-05-2009 1:48 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Stile, posted 10-09-2009 10:06 AM Perdition has replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3269 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 18 of 19 (529499)
10-09-2009 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Stile
10-09-2009 10:06 AM


Re: *clears throat*
I think Perdition has a great idea here. And one that would be really cool to add to your final product anyway, if you have the time.
I for one think you look marvelous up on that soapbox, and if you wish, I will make it my priority to "enforce" the quiet that is necessary to let your words of wisdom propagate through the skulls of all the riffraff in attendance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Stile, posted 10-09-2009 10:06 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by AdminNosy, posted 10-09-2009 4:08 PM Perdition has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024