I know the seas are still teaming with yet undiscovered creatures.
It has been estimated that we have only explored 5% of the ocean. It would be ludicrious to think that there are no large sea creatures unknown to man.
Some lake monsters might be possible too, due to the vastness of some lakes (Loch ness is both large and hard to see into. Sometimes they've hit something on sonar, othertimes not.)
Sasquatch-like critters are seen around the world, with some of them having a strong scientific possibility (Yeti, Yeren, Almas) while others seem to defy natural law (Big Grey Man of scotland).
The American sasquatch has a lot going for it;
upteenkillion prints (footprints, nuckle prints, hand prints, butt prints, one body print, hair stiratons in the latter at least)
Close examination of prints showing some with dermal ridges, imprints of sweat glands, midtarsal ridge (where the foot bends in the middle, found in no-human apes)
Sightings going back to leif erickson (8th century)
Native American knowledge (including cave art)
food supplies (cams, lichen, meat, etc)
and so on.
One good argument against it would be why one hasn't been hit by a car and made available to the public. But to me it doesn't outweigh the other evidence.
For info on sasquatch, see Jeff meldrum's "Sasquatch; legend meets science" and Loren Coleman's "Bigfoot: the true story of apes in america.
Edited by LudoRephaim, : No reason given.
Edited by LudoRephaim, : No reason given.
"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4