|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Seashells on tops of mountains. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
And how do you explain how life wasn't completely annihilated and scoured from the Earth after such a vapour canopy made having oxygen and nitrogen in one's blood toxic and the sheer amount of energy from releasing water from a mile under the mantle poaching everything?
The only things that could have survived such events could be thermophilic bacteria and organisms in completely sealed chambers with feet of insulation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
What evidence exists to support this?
Creationist grand claims against uniformity always lack a key argument: proof or evidence that things changed. Changing physics leaves evidence. As no such evidence exists, diluvial geology isn't a valid alternative.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
Seriously, sea shells on the top of mountains is really the least of your problems given the kind of arguments you are making.
1) Water from within the Earth is superheated.2) Releasing that much water from the Earth would boil the oceans 3) Boiling oceans kills all non-thermophilic bacteria 4) You just killed Noah 5) End of the Story 6) Game Over 7) You Lose
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
quote: How does a flood put everest where it is now? I notice that none of the creationists were are addressing the heat issue. Could you explain why they are doing this?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
quote: This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. How can a flood move tectonic plates or cause tectonic activity?
quote: Plates move around 1 inch a year. Increasing that rate increases the heat. To make Everest from sea level in 6,000 years requires plates moving at 5 or so feet a year. Where did all of this additional heat go and how did plates change suddenly from 5 feet a year to 1 inch? Edited by obvious Child, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
quote: No effect. Plates move on seas of magma underneath them and friction between plates. They do not move because of material on top of them. There are already trillions of tons of water on the planet that do not effect plate movement. On that logic, if top weight effected plate movement, the rockies and other mountain ranges should effect plate movement and not be the cause of plate movement. Your argument doesn't make any sense. Hence why your argument makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
quote: Because that's not how plates move. You are implying that a force that is seen no where on the planet can move material below it and force it up. That has to defy at least several laws of physics. Edited by obvious Child, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
Especially when the material below it is uniform. If the material wasn't uniform below it, the vertical force could move it diagonally and horizontally. However, there's no indication that magma under the plates isn't uniform.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
He's a YEC creationist. What did you expect?
Honesty? Not in their vocabulary. well, at least he didn't cite Bumgarder's idea, the one he admitted needs a miracle...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
Does it bother them that they are living a lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
You'd think that would be obvious, but I guess not.
Science and religion are fundamentally, intrinsically different. But I guess people still don't understand that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
obvious Child Member (Idle past 4146 days) Posts: 661 Joined: |
Off topic material hidden. Use "Peek" to read.
quote: At the risk of being off topic, it does. Dietary laws are quite relevant especially back in the day. And I think you miss something. Was God more interested in the moral actions of its creations verse giving an accurate description of how he made the world? Given the whole Jesus thing, to me it seems that morals trump story of origin. Therefore, the bible isn't a good science book and shouldn't be treated as such. The issue with that scripture is that the Earth was never flooded. Be careful that this message doesn't shoot you off on an off-topic tangent. - Adminnemooseus} Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Topic drift alert message. Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024