EvC Forum: Haeckel in Biology Textbooks

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Haeckel in Biology Textbooks

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 15 of 72 (482064)
09-14-2008 1:04 PM

Just an off topic thought... anyone know if creos and IDists deny the dodos ever existed?

Added by edit.

To bring my post somewhat on topic, anyone know why the creos and IDists continue to lie about Haeckel being in textbooks? I could have sworn one of god's 10 commandments forbid people from bearing false witness. What gives?

Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
	Message 18 by Beretta, posted 09-17-2008 5:09 AM		Taz has replied

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 25 of 72 (483115)
09-20-2008 2:21 AM

Reply to: Message 18 by Beretta
09-17-2008 5:09 AM

Re: Haeckel's Embryos

Beretta writes:

I have pulled out the first textbook that I could find. It is new. It has Haeckel's embryos in it. It may not call them Haeckel's embryos but it still clearly shows the earliest stages as being the most similar.Haeckel's fraud lives on.

I'm curious. Do you actually deny that embryos of different species at earliest stages look like each other? Because for one thing they actually are pretty darn similar to each other at the earliest stages. So, are you lying for jesus or just playing dumb?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 18 by Beretta, posted 09-17-2008 5:09 AM		Beretta has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 27 by Beretta, posted 09-20-2008 4:15 AM	Taz has replied
	Message 32 by Dr Jack, posted 09-20-2008 5:53 AM	Taz has replied

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 36 of 72 (483148)
09-20-2008 9:58 AM

Reply to: Message 32 by Dr Jack
09-20-2008 5:53 AM

Re: Haeckel's Embryos

Mr Jack writes:

We should be cautious about overstating the similarity of early embryonic stages

Of course we do. It all depends on the context of its mention in beretta's text book. He/she/it made it out to sound like the book said "everything looks like each other at the earliest stages of embryonic development therefore evolution is proven haw haw haw."

Notice how beretta hasn't stated anything specific about the supposed mention in the book or the text book itself. For now, we are still left with a bare mention.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 32 by Dr Jack, posted 09-20-2008 5:53 AM		Dr Jack has not replied

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 37 of 72 (483150)
09-20-2008 10:04 AM

Reply to: Message 27 by Beretta
09-20-2008 4:15 AM

Re: Haeckel's Embryos

beretta writes:

They are not most similar in the earliest stages as Haeckel clearly said they were -they are clearly distinguishable and only become more similar in the midstages.

I see that percy has already answered this.

So, again, are you lying for jesus or just playing dumb? Answer the the question.

Are you playing dumb or are you deceived OR are you lying for the cause of evolution and it's propogation as truth?

And exactly what statement by me are you referring to or do you just want to sound poetic?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 27 by Beretta, posted 09-20-2008 4:15 AM		Beretta has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

5 online now:	AZPaul3, dwise1, PaulK, Tangle, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 0/1