You might want to start by looking at your own knowledge about freedom, comparing it with strong anticipation theory. On an intellectual level your knowledge about freedom is very probably false. That should raise some concern for somebody who likes science, if their knowledge about something as fundamental as freedom is flawed. But the knowledge about freedom you use on a practical level in your day to day life is very probably correct, so no need to be overconcerned.
So then when you have some sound intellectual knowledge about freedom, then you might start to comprehend creationism a bit, and begin to understand how evidence for creation is arrived at.
You perhaps could look at the scientific method and the various evolutionary sciences through something other than a strict creationist filter.
You'd be amazed what you might learn.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2
