|
Author
|
Topic: Your prediction about outcome of Super Tuesday
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Yeah, it's McCain. But the Dems? With alla those superdelegates, it's awful darn easy for the DNC to pick the candidate (with a little bullying) ... so I'm not convinced these primaries mean too awful much. It's tough to figure who the DNC will pick to run against him.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by teen4christ, posted 01-30-2008 7:57 PM | | teen4christ has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
Message 8 of 109 (453005)
02-01-2008 1:16 AM
|
Reply to: Message 7 by Lemkin
01-31-2008 9:21 PM
|
|
An OT reply from Lem.
You say you believe in Christ, but, do you believe in the Bible? The Bible is the base of believing in Christ. From other messages it is blatantly obvious that you believe in the big bang theory. The two cannot coexist. The big bang theory says that we were created by chance and the Bible says that we were created by God. How can those two things function together. Next, you said that my question was not specific enough and that is why you gave a random answer, but it seems kind of obvious. If I asked a random person on the street what they believe, 90% of the time they would know what i'm talking about, but when we are both on a site called Creation vs. Evolution, it seems very clear. You said you are bothered because I do not think that you truly believe in Christ. Give me one reason why you would believe in Christ except for what the Bible teaches. The Bible says that Christ exists and you believe that. The Bible also says that everything in the Bible is true and there is no sense in believing in Christ unless you believe in the Bible, so why don't you believe Genesis 1:1 or any of the other verses that you call hatefull? How is any of this related to the upcoming presidential election? {Text of previous 3 messages and the above quoted is now "hidden" as being totally off-topic. - Adminnemooseus} Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 7 by Lemkin, posted 01-31-2008 9:21 PM | | Lemkin has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 9 by FliesOnly, posted 02-01-2008 8:13 AM | | molbiogirl has not replied | | | Message 51 by Lemkin, posted 02-04-2008 8:05 PM | | molbiogirl has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: Mcain is next president
I'm gonna hold you to this. (Ain't gonna happen. McCain won't win. We will not go to war with Iran even if he does.)
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 13 by skepticfaith, posted 02-01-2008 3:36 PM | | skepticfaith has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: An OT reply from Lem.
Mittster has him beat by a mile on flip flopping.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 17 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-01-2008 5:18 PM | | Hyroglyphx has replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: An OT reply from Lem.
That's why I said McCain will lose. You Republicans got JACK come November 4. McCain or Romney? That's the best y'all could do? Y'all best just roll over and play dead for 8 years. Y'all's toast.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 19 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-01-2008 6:04 PM | | Hyroglyphx has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: An OT reply from Lem.
Either Clinton or Obama. Obviously.
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: An OT reply from Lem.
Should you stick around long enough to be held accountable for this RIDICULOUS statement, I will hold you to this. And when Obama wins a second term, I will leave you a little "I told you so" on a political thread.
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Off topic - Content "hidden" - Start a new topic or something - Adminnemooseus
It will be interesting whether a US attack on Iran will the the "invasion of Poland" that will lead the world to finally say that enough is enough. Thank you, Chi. Exactly the point I was going to make. I recently had the chance to see Naomi Wolf's talk re: her book The End of America. Here's Naomi's take on Germany in the early 30s and legal pressures on a democracy aka how despots crack down: Every would-be dictator, whether on the left or the right, does the same 9 things. There is a blue print for crushing a democracy. Each of these steps is underway in the United States today courtesy of G. W. Bush. 1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external threat. 2. Create a secret prison system where torture takes place that is outside the rule of law. 3. Create a paramilitary force. 4. Create a surveillance apparatus aimed at ordinary citizens. 5. Traget key individuals for punishment as a result of this surveillance. 6. Arbitrarily detain and release citizens. 7. Restrict the press. 8. Re-cast criticism as treason. 9. Subvert the rule of law. The same is true of Italy (pre-Mussolini), Russia (pre-Stalin), Czechlovakia (pre-Ceausescu), Chile (pre-Pinochet). GWB has only #9 left. {Content "hidden" as being off-topic. Use "peek" if you must, but do not reply. Maybe find a better place for it? - Adminnemooseus} Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above. Despite that I agree about the "hidden" content. Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add subtitle.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 30 by Chiroptera, posted 02-01-2008 8:20 PM | | Chiroptera has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 50 of 109 (453827)
02-04-2008 11:23 AM
|
Reply to: Message 46 by Taz
02-03-2008 10:48 PM
|
|
Then came the night that shall ever be known as the night I cried myself to sleep when it became clear that Bush was going to win with a popular majority. Popular majority means nothing (see also: Gore). We all know how Bush got into the White House for his second term.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 46 by Taz, posted 02-03-2008 10:48 PM | | Taz has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: Racism or sexism: the dilemma of Afro-American women
Since this is an evolution forum - I believe there was a study conducted that showed EVEN white people tend to feel more comfortable around those of their own kind.. (I believe a series of slides of different people were shown) . Typical. "I saw a study once..." Until you provide EVIDENCE to support your racist bullshit, I am going to ignore your "study".
This can be seen in other animals that choose mates within their own subspecies or group. Homo sapiens is ONE species. There are NO subspecies. In fact, there is NO genetic basis for "race".
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: Racism or sexism: the dilemma of Afro-American women
T4C, your observation is limited by your experience.
It's kinda true, though. Just go to any college campus and observe. I have only attended 3 different colleges, and I can tell you for a fact, you are wrong. Furthermore, SF isn't simply claiming that "People hang out together". He's implying that "People mate within their own subspecies." That is pure, unadulterated racism, my friend.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 69 by teen4christ, posted 02-07-2008 6:24 PM | | teen4christ has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: Racism or sexism: the dilemma of Afro-American women
On the contrary, that would be an interesting topic worth debating. But not in this thread. Para. Just FYI. That was beaten to death on this board not too long ago. I held the bat. And SF. Your "race is MORE than skin color" aka "black folk have lower IQ" is so unbelievably offensive, I am willing to beat that tired piece of shit argument into the ground again. Write up a PNT. Hey. Here's an idea. If you've got the balls, open it in Free For All.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 66 by Parasomnium, posted 02-07-2008 4:52 PM | | Parasomnium has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 85 of 109 (454783)
02-08-2008 5:46 PM
|
Reply to: Message 83 by Taz
02-08-2008 5:31 PM
|
|
Dunno what the DNC will decide. 40% in the superdelegate's hands? WTF? The decision isn't in the hands of the electorate! Anyhoo. I doubt either will consent to serve as VP.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 83 by Taz, posted 02-08-2008 5:31 PM | | Taz has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 87 by Taz, posted 02-08-2008 7:38 PM | | molbiogirl has replied | | | Message 107 by Rrhain, posted 02-13-2008 4:38 AM | | molbiogirl has not replied | | | Message 108 by Rrhain, posted 02-13-2008 4:39 AM | | molbiogirl has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
Re: putting this to rest...
Just as I thought. No balls. You gotta a pair, you suggest a PNT. Otherwise, your "notions" 'bout "race" are consigned to KKK history.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 79 by skepticfaith, posted 02-08-2008 12:22 PM | | skepticfaith has not replied |
|
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: 06-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 88 of 109 (454815)
02-08-2008 7:40 PM
|
Reply to: Message 87 by Taz
02-08-2008 7:38 PM
|
|
Hell no. I bet my left nut Edwards will not consent to run as VP.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 87 by Taz, posted 02-08-2008 7:38 PM | | Taz has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 89 by Taz, posted 02-08-2008 7:43 PM | | molbiogirl has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2