Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Life! What a concept!
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 15 of 44 (448818)
01-15-2008 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by New Cat's Eye
01-15-2008 1:42 AM


Old news
CS writes:
And if you define life as "the genome", which Seth does, then life most certainly is digital.
Oh shit. Don't let Hoot Mon find out....
Old news. Only the chemo-heads should be surprised.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-15-2008 1:42 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 16 of 44 (448822)
01-15-2008 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by nwr
01-15-2008 1:00 AM


Digital or what?
nwr writes:
In this discussion there appears to be an assumption that life is digital. I likewise believe that to be a faulty assumption.
You may be right. But can you identify anything in nature besides life that engages digital information, genetic otherwise, to communicate structural and functional analogs from one generation to the next?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by nwr, posted 01-15-2008 1:00 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by nwr, posted 01-15-2008 12:12 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 24 by teen4christ, posted 01-15-2008 5:43 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 18 of 44 (448833)
01-15-2008 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by nwr
01-15-2008 12:12 PM


Re: Digital or what?
nwr writes:
I distinguish between "uses digital" and "is digital". It is the latter that I question.
Yes, of course. But the key word in the latter is "is." As such, you may be working on an ontological landscape. That's like asking, What kind of "being" does life have? Certainly life exists. And certainly life requires gooey chemicals, just like music requires musical instruments. Who would disagree? But life goes beyond the gooey and the instrumental. Life fits through a very narrow aperture called fertilization. That's where the digital part becomes really interesting, because there isn't much of any analogs that get through that tiny hole.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by nwr, posted 01-15-2008 12:12 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by nwr, posted 01-15-2008 12:39 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 21 by molbiogirl, posted 01-15-2008 2:49 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 22 of 44 (448877)
01-15-2008 3:24 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by molbiogirl
01-15-2008 2:49 PM


Re: Digital or what?
molbio writes:
HM, let's try to stay on topic. If you'd like to comment on the contents of the .pdf, that's fine.
Well, excuse me, then. In the subject .pdf of your OP, Seth Lloyd says this:
quote:
It's interesting because in fact the digital nature of genetic information, the fact that it's seven billion bits that can easily be written into a computer hard drive, makes genetic information much more like the information in computers and it can be manipulated in that way. Whereas strangely enough, our mental information, the information that's in our brains, is much less digital in a fashion, and much harder to get hold of.
So do you want to discuss the digital claims made in the subject .pdf or not? Or do you just want to bitch at somebody?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by molbiogirl, posted 01-15-2008 2:49 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by molbiogirl, posted 01-15-2008 4:30 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 30 of 44 (448967)
01-15-2008 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by molbiogirl
01-15-2008 4:30 PM


Re: Digital or what?
molbiogirl writes:
If you'd like to debate the digital nature of DNA, fine.
If you'd like to debate the nature of life, please take it to the appropriate thread: Message 1 (Thread Is there a border dividing life from non-life? in Forum Origin of Life).
Molbio, go back and read your own OP. You opened up a discussion of EDGE's pub: "Life: What a Concept!" And when I began discussing it contents you bitched at me about going off topic. You seem like you'd rather bitch at people than discuss a topic that you yourself brought up. Besides, this the Coffee House thread. If I want to express my opinion that life is digital first and chemical second on this threat I should be allowed to without having to suffer your literary yeast infection.
So get off your high horse.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by molbiogirl, posted 01-15-2008 4:30 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by molbiogirl, posted 01-15-2008 9:53 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 31 of 44 (448970)
01-15-2008 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by teen4christ
01-15-2008 5:43 PM


Re: Digital or what?
t4c writes:
Prions and the elements inside a burning star. Neither is considered "life" by any conventional mean and both pass on "digital" information to the next generation.
Hi teen4christ,
Could you elaborate on how prions and elements inside stars would qualify as having or being digital information? This would be relevant to what Seth Lloyd said about digital information in the subject document.
”HM
Please read Message 40 before responding to this post.
Thanks --AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by teen4christ, posted 01-15-2008 5:43 PM teen4christ has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by TheNaturalist, posted 01-22-2008 7:17 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 41 of 44 (449068)
01-16-2008 11:15 AM


The Book
Well, OK then, let's discuss the book without touching on any of its ideas. For starters the book is not bound very well. But it's free. I think the font probably is Times New Roman. And it's double spaced, too, for easier reading. Yes, and the authors...oh, sorry, that's OT because it's not about the book. Hmm, not much else to say, except B&N doesn't carry it and you have to provide your own paper if you want a printed version. That's 'bout it, so far as the book is concerned.
Gosh, am I a good poster! Stayed right on topic for the good of EvC and all mankind.
”HM

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024