Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist model
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 7 of 242 (446106)
01-04-2008 9:50 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by tesla
01-04-2008 9:43 PM


telsa writes:
are you real? and by saying your real, you mean also that you exist?
I think you had better assume you and Rahvin are real otherwise you will never get to the creationist model.
It's been a long time coming and I for one am anxious to the heart of this model; no blather, please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 9:43 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 9 of 242 (446108)
01-04-2008 9:52 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by tesla
01-04-2008 9:50 PM


Cut to the model!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 9:50 PM tesla has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 9:53 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 12 of 242 (446111)
01-04-2008 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by tesla
01-04-2008 9:53 PM


Go ahead!
There is nothing I could possibly do to stop you.
Don't respond to me, just present what you want to present but please bypass the "am I real are you real bullshit".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 9:53 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 14 of 242 (446114)
01-04-2008 10:04 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:00 PM


telsa writes:
could you also say that you could not exist as matter inside of anything that was not composed of matter, and be "real"?
As you could exist within a vacuum your point suggestion is flawed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:00 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 15 of 242 (446116)
01-04-2008 10:04 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:00 PM


Double post, sorry.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:00 PM tesla has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:08 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 22 of 242 (446124)
01-04-2008 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:08 PM


Please get to the point or come to chat and say what you need to before you use more posts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:08 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 28 of 242 (446132)
01-04-2008 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:16 PM


If nothing could exist, we would not exist.
We exist so things can exist.
Can we move on?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:16 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 32 of 242 (446136)
01-04-2008 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:21 PM


You only need to think of real matter in the real universe.
Leave unreal matter to the unreal universes inhabitants.
Bring on the evidence and quit this philosophical wanking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:21 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 38 of 242 (446143)
01-04-2008 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:44 PM


So we are back to your hobby horse of existance: again.
Please cut it out and GET ON WITH IT!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:44 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 41 of 242 (446148)
01-04-2008 10:53 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:48 PM


But you have not done so. You are no claser to your expalnation of you mythical model than when you started.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:48 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 43 of 242 (446150)
01-04-2008 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by tesla
01-04-2008 10:53 PM


Re: First learn what a model is
You said you would provide evidence and you have not done so.
Please do and we can progress.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 10:53 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 51 of 242 (446207)
01-05-2008 7:03 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by tesla
01-05-2008 3:22 AM


Still waiting for less bullshit and more model or else you could stand accused of lying.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by tesla, posted 01-05-2008 3:22 AM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 53 of 242 (446218)
01-05-2008 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by tesla
01-05-2008 8:49 AM


Re: my creation model
So you 'model' for creationism is the scientific one with god bolted on to the start?
Way to provide a creationism model.
So your 'evidence' is your personal belief.
Way to provide evidence.
But you have very clearly showed the extreme paucity of creationist scientific rigour.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by tesla, posted 01-05-2008 8:49 AM tesla has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by tesla, posted 01-05-2008 9:25 AM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 61 of 242 (446337)
01-05-2008 6:27 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by tesla
01-05-2008 12:19 PM


Re: my creation model
tesla writes:
i can only present evidence and its up to the individual to connect the dots.
But you have not presented any evidence at all.
This thread is about the creationist model that you were going to describe, not your apparent dissonance about existance.
You need to join the dots for us if you are presenting your ideas as a viable model.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by tesla, posted 01-05-2008 12:19 PM tesla has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 90 of 242 (446486)
01-06-2008 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by tesla
01-06-2008 12:37 PM


Re: my creation model
Telsa it is obvious that your creation model is not real and has no existance.
It is also obvious that your evidence for your non existant creation model is not real and has no existance.
In fact, none of you ideas seem to have any relevance to anyone older than 5 (this being the age one developes the 'Theory of Mind' and implicity understand that for one to function in the adult world one treats all external information as a pretty accurate reflection of the world and than other people are as real as you are).
The way to prove reality is to point to it a say "ta da!"
Still hoping the model will appear, though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by tesla, posted 01-06-2008 12:37 PM tesla has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by tesla, posted 01-06-2008 2:10 PM Larni has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024