Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Theory of Evolution and model of evolution
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 54 (440046)
12-11-2007 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by newflyer
12-11-2007 9:44 AM


Hi, newflyer.
There are plenty of problems with it. One of the first is that evolutionists cannot explain the origins of life....
How is this a problem for the theory of evolution? Newton's law of gravity doesn't explain the origins of life, either, but no one claims that this is a problem.
-
Creationists at least have the argument that God came into time and space and created life.
Well, unless the hypothesis can be tested then it isn't a scientific theory -- unless you can do experiments or make observations that indicate that God created life, then this is just making something up to get an answer.

If it's truly good and powerful, it deserves to engender a thousand misunderstandings. -- Ben Ratcliffe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by newflyer, posted 12-11-2007 9:44 AM newflyer has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 54 (440051)
12-11-2007 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by godbuster666
12-11-2007 9:52 AM


Re: Ok ,get your facts right
Welcome to EvC, godbuster. But I have to say that your response here isn't really very helpful. If newflyer is wrong, then a summary of the facts and logically sound argument will suffice to show this. This kind of inflammatory response is uncalled for and is just going to be counter-productive.

If it's truly good and powerful, it deserves to engender a thousand misunderstandings. -- Ben Ratcliffe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by godbuster666, posted 12-11-2007 9:52 AM godbuster666 has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 54 (442872)
12-22-2007 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Volunteer
12-22-2007 8:07 PM


Re: A basic question.
Is the Second Law of Thermodynamics correct or not?
Who knows? Any of the "laws of physics" are not really "laws" that nature must obey. They are merely regularities that we have observed up to now. It is a good question whether or not these will always be observed or whether or not we will eventually discover exceptions to these regularities.

"The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but the one who causes the darkness."
Clearly, he had his own strange way of judging things. I suspect that he acquired it from the Gospels. -- Victor Hugo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Volunteer, posted 12-22-2007 8:07 PM Volunteer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024