Author
|
Topic: Theory of Evolution and model of evolution
|
newflyer
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 15 of 54 (440029)
12-11-2007 9:44 AM
|
|
|
Evolution is simply a theory. There are plenty of problems with it. One of the first is that evolutionists cannot explain the origins of life, instead they counter that once life is generated, it can evolve into more complex forms. Creationists at least have the argument that God came into time and space and created life. What do y'all think of that?
|
newflyer
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 17 of 54 (440031)
12-11-2007 9:51 AM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by jar 12-11-2007 9:48 AM
|
|
But it's an explanation, where none exists on the evolutionist side. Regardless of whether you agree with it or not, it can't be disproven, and it's more of an explanation than you offer.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 16 by jar, posted 12-11-2007 9:48 AM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 20 by jar, posted 12-11-2007 10:00 AM | | newflyer has replied | | Message 24 by Percy, posted 12-11-2007 10:24 AM | | newflyer has not replied | | Message 41 by RAZD, posted 12-11-2007 8:51 PM | | newflyer has not replied |
|
newflyer
Inactive Member
|
Re: Ok ,get your facts right
First off, no one is "bobble headed." Obviously you have a personal problem with God, but that doesn't de-legitamize the fact that creationists can explain the origins of life, whereas evolutionists simply have to accept that magically it was created or arose out of natural processes, none of which have ever been observed. Lucy is not a good example, because scientists are not unanimous in there knowledge of her origins. Further, all of her bones were found scattered miles apart, and the argument that somehow they form complete skeletal remains is ridiculous, and would be disregarded as bad science by evolutionists if it supported the creationist viewpoint.
|
newflyer
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 22 of 54 (440041)
12-11-2007 10:05 AM
|
Reply to: Message 20 by jar 12-11-2007 10:00 AM
|
|
Re: On How Things work
But it's not a dead-end. It's a legitimate answer to a hard question that you yourself admit we'll never have the answer to. We do have an answer, and if you can't accept that, then it's not worth it to argue with you. There are lots of evidences for creationism. The foremost and most recent one is the helium leak rate.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 20 by jar, posted 12-11-2007 10:00 AM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 23 by jar, posted 12-11-2007 10:15 AM | | newflyer has not replied | | Message 44 by RAZD, posted 12-11-2007 9:53 PM | | newflyer has not replied |
|