But it's not a dead-end.
How did God create life? When we make that next step, asking how it was done, we move directly to Abiogenesis, the study of how life came from non-life.
Even if, like I believe, God is the the creator of all that is, seen and unseen, to have any understanding we must continue asking the questions. If we simply stop at "God Did It" we only assure that we will remain in ignorance.
There are lots of evidences for creationism. The foremost and most recent one is the helium leak rate.
I'm sorry but you must remember that your sources are lying to you. There is no other way to put it.
BUT, there is an even bigger problem. Disproving Evolution or Abiogenesis does not add any weight or support for Creationism. If Creationism is ever to get beyond being a joke and a congame sucking money out of the pockets of ignorant, gullible Christians, it must present a model that explains what is seen better than the current conventional models. That has simply never been done.
Before you go much further you should probably study
How can "Creationism" be supported?.
Immigration has been a problem
Since 1607!