The Fascism of a Monopoly

I propose a topic to discuss how the Mods and Admins purposely stifle debate by not allowing an open dialogue. I would like people to post excerpts of this very thing happening.Crush the fascism of the nazi-like regime at EvC. I predict only evolutionists (common descent, wizard of oz, etc)will disagree and thus prove my point. Thank you.

http://EvC Forum: What evidence, when Darwin/Wallace began work made them think of evolution? -->EvC Forum: What evidence, when Darwin/Wallace began work made them think of evolution?
Why did this even start? I was under the impression (by the name of this site, go figure!?) that this was a debate forum for EvC. MageCraft's question shouldn't have been put into biological evolution section it should have been shoved under the rug in a damp hole like this thread I started.

It shows the preference given to the Hypothesis of Evolution as opposed to a serious thread of examining the corruptness of EvC Admins and Mods to give special treatments to evolutionists.

This is from the same thread you quoted me from.Notice how I had given you a definition, and then you said and then you quoted my definition in the same paragraph!You kept telling me to stay on point like your some kind of mod!? While you ignored my point. It was high time someone put you in your place woman even if it was offensive. I could apologize...nah Thanks mom. My argument stands on well reasoned argumentation: your not a mod. your not an admin. and your also not on topic which proves my point of special treatment to smart-ass HOE's (hypothesis of evolutioner's) like yourself. Your not going to get a mod in here saying, "you need to be on topic." Why? Well that's why I opened this thread so thank you. Me: 1 You: 0

Every time, I'm always wrong to a HOE (hypothesis of evolutioner).My point is well illustrated by your post. Your ignorance shines a light upon my argument, thank you.There is no reason that post should have made it into the biological evolution section. Unless..., the administration here is either proselytizing or it was an honest mistake. And we all know in our secret heart space that it's the former.Don't deny the truth. I wanted examples of how this applies and everyone that's posted has been off topic and made argument ad hominem. Yet no Mod to moderate, i'm not surprised.

Think about it. If the admins weren't corrupt, they never would have allowed it. It would sound so ludicris as to not even warrent a thread. But they couldn't have it lingering on the proposed new topics section for young fish to come see, no. they had to move it to the remote reaches of the discussion board so no one would find it. Only those who have commented thus far I suspect are in league with the admins. It all fits together...

hilarious, it's kind of like how common descent is a story of fanciful imaginings that people actually believed are backed by a giant scary science facts but really its just insignificant god haters pulling strings.Basically, I have noticed that treatment towards opposing viewpoints of evolution and related philosophy get treatment that to me seems unfair. I'm trying to gather evidence of this phenomenon to produce data affirming my hypothesis. So far I've been met with incredulity.This thread has nothing to do with Mods or Admins doing their jobs. Rather it has to do with the lack of doing their jobs or of special bias.This is only a hypothesis and as of the present I haven't heard of any thing to solidify my musings. Although I have had limited time and if my predictions are correct I will soon put together a phylogenic tree of corruptness.

I completely disagree.The "evidence" points towards design not random chance. Try to stay on topic and read the previous posts please.And as far as i've read i'm the only creationist being my nasty ol' self. MUCH like the vast majority of HOE's around here.Also, creationists deserve no special "latitude" nor does HOE's deserve the same from a mod or a admin, which is why this thread exists. Truthfully I've never been to a forum with so much bias.

kuresu instead of trying to argue for the sake of arguing maybe you shouldn't read what you want to read and instead read what's there.I never said "evolution" was random chance. random chance is a mechanism for evolution or a foundation of the theory. But it all boils down to the same thing. And how do you know I don't know damn all about biology? You psychic?I could also give a rat's ass about someone's positional feelings being compromised. And what defines him as my "opponent?"
You look about as old as your arguments belie.

You need to quit playing mod as I have pointed out numerous times. I don't need a shadow thank you. And as for what AdminPD said, he'll need to pull RAZD's use of creationosiritss or whatever for that to be fair and not back my theory of corruption. I can easily see how that relates to the spanish conquistidors and there use of Christianity to torture people. If he wants to infer dirty things from my simplification of what evolution is, then I deem that unfair and was going to privately consult with the admins on this matter. So butt out.Does it matter what I think concerning Mods or Admins? No. But I'll exercise my privelege to bitch. And please stay on topic, k?