CrashFrog writes:
Then I came to the understanding that what I knew as "God" was actually me talking to myself.
That is simultaneously hilarious and insightful. Thanks for sharing that.
I have been around and associated with evangelical culture for some time. As an observer, I am often taken by the self-centered perspective that religion often takes in people lives. I know there are true self-denying saints out there like the Schweitzer's, Teresa's and even Paul Farmer's but the vast majority embrace Christianity as a crutch, comforter, vending machine and a get out of hell ticket. Every happening or mundane coincidence is interpreted as have "spiritual" significance and interpreted from a self-centered perspective - the universe evolves around their very salvation and happiness. They often talk about the dramatic changes in lives and i see the same twisted screwed-up selfish people that I see more secular environments, maybe even more so.
Back to the topic. I have yet to read the God Delusion, but have read most of Dawkin's other books. Some other poster on here provided a link to a rebuttal by Dr Denis Alexander which I thought was rather weak. I only got thru the first half of Alexander's talk and will pick the rest up later. In the first half, he criticized Dawkin's notion of Memes presented in the book. His complaint was that Memes can include scientific ideas and fads and so therefore the Meme concept is useless and flawed. I thought, sure science is subjected to the foibles of human psychology but the unwaveringly reliance on honesty, logic and supporting data provide an objective correction to the inherent weakness of human nature something missing in the religious world. Popular religion instead feeds and is powered on by human frailty.
I hope to read Dawkin's book this summer.