Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is God 'allowed' to change his mind?
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 46 (39267)
05-07-2003 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by crashfrog
05-07-2003 3:21 PM


A little comedy on the same subject.
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by crashfrog, posted 05-07-2003 3:21 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 46 (39276)
05-07-2003 5:13 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Paul
05-07-2003 4:57 PM


quote:
About homosexuality Sir, human male species in particular, do you think it was part of evolutions plan that a man should have sexual intercourse with another man?
Since evolution is a description of event, not a sentient being, it can't actually have a plan of any kind.
quote:
Since this action has been widespread throughout the world for milleniums, it must be part of the evolutionary process correct?
Why's that?
quote:
Oh there not trying to reproduce? Well, why would they do such a thing to each other then Sir?
Show me one 9th grade boy who doesn't understand why someone would have sex that won't result in reproduction, and I'll show you a future chartered accountant.
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Paul, posted 05-07-2003 4:57 PM Paul has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 46 (39393)
05-08-2003 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Paul
05-08-2003 11:12 AM


I was gonna put a big long response here.
Then I realized that no one should even have to respond to a chain of thought that states, "Oh, you think sex feels good! So you approve of murder, then?"
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Paul, posted 05-08-2003 11:12 AM Paul has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 46 (39569)
05-09-2003 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Rrhain
05-09-2003 7:15 PM


quote:
I think if you took a poll of the atheists around us, they'd have something to say about whether or not that "second law" existed.
Excuse me... I'm an athiest, and I fully believe that a robot should obey orders, except when in direct conflict with the first law.
...
What? Spiritual law? Oh, nevermind.
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Rrhain, posted 05-09-2003 7:15 PM Rrhain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024