I welcome your replies, but I do not welcome the purposeful offensiveness, and the harrassment. It's uncalled for.
Every time you say it's illegal to offend someone, it becomes entirely called-for to offend you, just so you can see how legal it is.
But wait, I forgot... you can have the cops slap a restraining order on me at any second. Boy, I hope you don't do that.
I don't have a definate clear cut answer, but I can see some reasons why, I've posted a few.
The only reason you've given so far is that you don't want your children to see the TV shows you choose to bring into your home.
Maybe if people had more respect for each other, and didn't do stupid things like purposfully offend each other, our freedom would be much more free.
Got it. If the people didn't want to exercise their freedoms, maybe we could have those freedoms.
Unfounded comments like those make you lose credibility.
I'll go ahead and risk it.
Let me go all the way back to my first post, so that you can understand the spirit in which I have ventured into this discussion
Message 2"You also may be right, I amy not be aware of what I am advocating, but I am sure I will learn here, and sort it out."
Doesn't sound like the comments of someone proudly proclaiming anything.
And yet, in... wow, 133 posts now, you have still failed to answer a simple question about the validity of the FCC's ability to censor content, while still pointing to it as a reason why censorship is okay. So the things you say about learning, and sorting out, are at best disengenuous.
One doesn't have to know the reasons why. It is the law.
Brenna sums up the only possible reaction to this statement way better than I ever could.
How is that a leap? It's a fact. And probably a contributing factor as to why the FCC does have control.
Oh. So your reason
is that speech should only be free if nobody can hear it.
Your starting to wine.
After reading your posts, I could certainly use a glass.
So then, why is it that you will get a ticket?
See above. Already answered. The man with a bulllhorn is infringing on others without their permission. They didn't bring him into their home, and ask him to scream. You, on the other hand, bought a TV, put it in your home, and turned it on.
That is also against the rules of this forum. Keep doing it, and you will see, the secret service will contact you, without my help.
Bush continues to be a prick. And is probably raping kittens right now.
I expect the Secret Service to show up any time now.
Seriously, any second.
Here I disagree. I may or moay not have a legal reason to stand on
You don't. That should be... damn, just
blindingly obvious at this point.
but all I can say is, that we have to share this world together. You would rather have me isolate myself, and my children.
Actually, I would rather have you not try to be my children's parents. You go ahead and make decisions for your children, and I'll handle mine.
And no, there's really no room for agreeing to disagree on whether a man like you gets to make parenting decisions for my children.
That's what Jim Jones did.
Aaaaand...
there goes your ability to ever complain about anyone else's ridiculous leaps. After all, I know you don't like being called a hypocrite.
I have a concern for children who are unsupervised watching content, that is not appropiate for there age.
Be as concerned as you please. But if they're not your kids, it's not your decision.
By turning it on.
According to the rules set forth by the FCC.
Yes I do when it is my government that is the ones regulating it.
And, of course, this is the same FCC/government/what-have-you regulation for which you have failed to present a single legal justification.
So basically, you've got nothing, but continue to insist on your point of view. Oh, and you're here to learn, apparently.
"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert
™ Version 4.2
