Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligence Quotients: science or pop pyschology?
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4089 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 9 of 25 (386421)
02-21-2007 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by macaroniandcheese
02-21-2007 11:56 AM


the iq tests test the potential for abstract reasoning in traditionally educated, english speaking people.
Yep.
I do really well on IQ tests. It would be awesome if it was really a measure of "intelligence" over all, because then I'd be smarter than most people. However, I'm not. When it comes to the basics of living, I've found most people can figure out the best solution to their problems every bit as well as I can. I can solve geometry problems better than most, but that's about it.
What I'd really like is if it were a good measure of the ability to answer riddles or find insightful interpretations of allegorical stories. I'd love to be good at either, but instead, I'm lousy at both.
I know I could beat my wife on an IQ test, but when there's a hundred things to do and life seems horribly confusing, she has no problem figuring out some way to get all 100 things done in a timely manner. They need a test to measure that ability, because if I could hire her or me for almost any job that didn't involve lots and lots of math or brute strength, I'd hire her.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-21-2007 11:56 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-21-2007 4:18 PM truthlover has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024