|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Who won the Collins-Dawkins Debate? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
In summary you have been using highly improbable events as justifications for your faith and the supernatural. quote: The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Deeply religious people who don't have any doubt at all scare the crap out of me. That's the honest truth. I just don't have any understanding whatsoever of that kind of certainty of belief. I don't have that kind of surety of belief or confidence of my understanding of anything at all. Not a single thing do I think I understand or believe 100%, with no doubts at all. How can I be completely sure, since I am a mere human with human limitations of imagination and intellect and ability to access information? How can anybody be without any doubt, about anything?
quote: Well, damn, I'll have to remember to use that line again. Edited by nator, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
nator writes: I don't have that kind of surety of belief or confidence of my understanding of anything at all... How can I be completely sure, since I am a mere human with human limitations of imagination and intellect and ability to access information?
I have come to the conclusion that your above statement is the only honest position. Jumping into the bed of any ole attractive theology that vies for your attention is really infidelity to the true unrevealed God. Let's just hope that God does not hold any grudges for those with misguided but strong convictions. Which I suppose makes me paradoxically sure about one thing - The First Church of the Agnostic is really the only one true church. Or maybe I am just jealous of those that know for absolutely sure.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Oh wow. You need to read this essay that my friend wrote a long time ago.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22508 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.4 |
Schraf writes: The plural of "anecdote" is not "data". This is extremely well put. Is it yours? Doesn't matter, I'm shamelessly stealing it anyway at the first opportunity. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kader Member (Idle past 3758 days) Posts: 156 Joined: |
The First Church of the Agnostic is really the only one true church. Agnosticism is not a church...I hope it will never be called a church neither... A "movement" at best, but certainly not a church.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
Thanks nator for the link. I very much enjoyed reading your friend's essay and found some additional insight.
Brad Weier writes: In order to believe that the Bible, or the Koran, or the Sutras, or any ancient text is an absolute and literal description of reality is to ignore reality. Just a note Kader
kader writes: Agnosticism is not a church... Sorry kader if that offended thee. How this.... "Agnosticism Is the One True Religion."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4090 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Deeply religious people who don't have any doubt at all scare the crap out of me. Me, too. I didn't say I didn't have any doubts. I said I wasn't troubled by them, anymore. Some doubts are big enough to be troubling. Others are small enough that they don't worry you. "There's always a possibility that I might be wrong or even totally insane" is not the sort of doubt that one loses sleep over.
I just don't have any understanding whatsoever of that kind of certainty of belief. There's a certainty of belief that makes it worth losing your life--or completely changing it. Such belief comes from inside a person, and it is very reassuring, even if there's always the "sure, of course I could be completely missing something and this could all be not true" admission that must be made.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4090 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Jumping into the bed of any ole attractive theology that vies for your attention is really infidelity to the true unrevealed God. It's infidelity to the true God even if he's revealed. On this issue, we agree completely.
Let's just hope that God does not hold any grudges for those with misguided but strong convictions. Which I suppose makes me paradoxically sure about one thing - The First Church of the Agnostic is really the only one true church. And how likely is it, that if there is a revealed God that has judgments for beyond this life, that he'll accept, "Well, it really seemed pretty unknowable to me, so I just did whatever I thought was best without really looking that hard to see if you had any requirements or suggestions"? The problem is, the First Church of the Agnostic has morals, commands, rules, and a way of life as well. Being a part of it is a lifestyle choice. And if it turns out that God isn't unknowable, and maybe there's something inside or outside of you that you should have been listening to, then the First Church of the Agnostic will turn out not to be the one true religion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kader Member (Idle past 3758 days) Posts: 156 Joined: |
No offense taken at all
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
I glad we found some common ground, however....
truthlover writes: And how likely is it, that if there is a revealed God that has judgments for beyond this life, that he'll accept, "Well, it really seemed pretty unknowable to me, so I just did whatever I thought was best without really looking that hard to see if you had any requirements or suggestions"? Oh now that's a dig and I take offense. Most confirmed agnostics I know spend more time and energy pondering the mysteries of life than the confirmed religious. Being agnostic is not just being lazy and shrugging your shoulders. Being agnostic means that you use your God given talent and senses to constantly evaluate the evidence, and will not settle for a comfortable pew and spoon fed theology. The agnostic believes in expanding and learning and rejects stagnation, complacency and laziness. Speaking of lazy. Consider this, and be honest, how many Christians do you know have no clue how the bible was canonized? How many Christian are completely unaware of the problems that biblical textual analysis reveals? How many Christians are aware of the probable additions. How many Christians know of the borrowed myths. How many Christians have never heard of the hard stories in the Old Testament or the Cursing Psalms. There are many things avoided in Sunday School. Now speaking of truth. The agnostic rejects falsehood and untruth and value honesty. However, within Christian circles I find an incredible tolerance for self-deception and error within their own sphere. I often listen to the Moody bible channel on the way to work. The radio preachers employ well known established logical fallicies with alarming frequency and no one in the flock calls their crap. They regularly use lies and deception to tend to the flock. Even more moderate Christians ignore obvious falsehoods and fraud within their own midsts and take no initiative to actively condemn such transgressions. As another example of this I have a somewhat interesting story. A while back I became aware of a charismatic group claiming Gemstones falling from Heaven and being delivered during meetings by angels. When I watched several of their videos with a friend and said either this is the most important event in the last 2000 years of Christianity or this is outright fraud. Now listen carefully. Being the extreme skeptic that I am, I did not immediately reject the notion that they were *not* telling the truth. True skepticism even rejects the harden skeptical knee jerk reaction. I launched a unbiased investigation into their claims and wrote up my experience here, Gemstones from Heaven This is an example of not being lazy or complacent. However many of the Christians I know, even some that attend that church, don't believe it but just shrug their shoulders and go oh well! Oh Well!!!! it is bloody fraud in the name of their precious lord! and they are indifferent? Edited by iceage, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4090 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Oh now that's a dig and I take offense. It was not a dig, but it was obviously very unfortunate wording (and thinking that produced that wording), and I apologize profusely. I actually paused for a moment when I wrote that about not looking very hard, because I am already aware that more agnostics/atheists than Christians put great thought into their belief. But here's why I wrote it. I was simply addressing the thought behind your post, not any particular person, real or imagined. The statement in your post was "Yes, and because there's no way to know anything for absolutely certain, then agnosticism should be the one true religion." I was only addressing that thought and disagreeing with it. That thought is not the same, or even nearly the same, as, "If we look into it, and it looks like God is not knowable or has chosen not to reveal himself, then we ought to be agnostic. In fact, I'm so certain that's what you'll find, that I'll call agnosticism the one true religion." I read a book once by William Law called something like A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life, and it addresses the fact that most Christians just cruise along through life with little effort. I am well aware that this is typical of Christians (way too typical of humans, in fact), and it is less typical of non-theists. I hope that is a sufficient retraction of my dig. I did not mean to imply that any individual (agnostic or Christian) was looking insufficiently, and I apologize for writing in such a way that it sounded like I was. I readily admit that all you said in your post 251 about searching for truth is accurate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4090 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Oh Well!!!! it is bloody fraud in the name of their precious lord! and they are indifferent? Yes, indifferent. It's maddening and embarrassing. The main reason people are indifferent is because it happens every day. It's not against the law, so they don't go to jail for it, so they'll just do it again and again and again. After looking into a few hundred of those, you don't have any more moments of your precious life to waste checking on those things. I've followed up on numerous such stories, including one recently from someone I thought was honest. It was the only reason I was willing to waste more time asking about such a thing. At least I found out the guy wasn't honest. I'm not indifferent, though. We oppose and expose those frauds pretty strenuously if we can find anyone who cares about what's true. Sometimes those people are hard to find.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: As much as I would love to take credit for this phrase, I cannot. I heard it first from Zhimbo, but I don't know if it is his or if he heard it from someone else. I can't ask him, either, because he is currently napping. A long, long night of writing last night for him.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: OK, now I understand better. That's not so scary. In fact, this makes you and I very similar, since I am an agnostic.
quote: Perhaps the difference is I doubt everything, and I am quite comfortable with such doubts, and you are only comfortable with certain doubts?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024