General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 9.0

We know I never said that. I said what those atheist regimes did is equivalent to what Quetzal (= atheist) advocated. It is an analogy that is absolutely accurate. If I had no point, and if you did not understand, then you would not be pursuing. You do understand the point and are pursuing and misrepresenting because you cannot refute.Ray

There is no shame or insult in being incarcerated in Showcase (formerly Boot Camp) Forums. Objective persons (who are not naieve) know the real reason is rage caused by the inability to refute and the perceived harm to status quo arguments; and the censorship is instantly explained when we remember that we are Creationists and our captors are Darwinists.I have said the above before and will never tire of pointing these invulnerable truths out. If roles were reversed the premise is not harmed.Arach: why was Faith permanently banned?Ray

Negative. Your spin is silly. No I have not because I cannot figure out how to do that. But if you are saying that UD does the same then I would make the same argument there, that is, I would say treating dissent in any manner of a Showcase forum or worse indicates rage caused by the inability to refute.The only persons who should be banned are posts that contain meaningless profanity and substanceless one liners. What was the reason given; where is that link?Ray

Hi Danny: You agreed with PaulK, that is, both of you evos think anyone who disagrees with your senseless atheistic philosophy dressed as science is mentally ill. If this were not true then you would not be pursuing me since decent persons give no attention to invective.To say it a little more plainly so that you can understand: if what I said was without merit then you would not give it the time of day, but you have pursued it which means your conscience has betrayed your guilt.Don't feel that bad; Richard Dawkins, a man with a Ph.D. revived the "disagree with me or you are mentally ill" tactic as long ago as "Blind Watchmaker" (1986). The tactic originates from the New Testament when the Pharisees branded Jesus a crazy demon possessed lunatic for making the claims that He made about Himself (Son of God).Jesus (the ultimate source) responded by saying the Pharisees were liars of their Father the Devil. Imagine that; thinking you are worshipping God when in fact you are deceived by the devil?If the Pharisees are as such then how much more atheists like Dawkins and yourself (= persons who oppose Jesus like the Pharisees).Ray