Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who won the Collins-Dawkins Debate?
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 31 of 279 (376736)
01-13-2007 1:55 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Rob
01-13-2007 1:03 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
Rob writes:
I didn't say anything about people claiming to be God in my point. That is much different than claiming to know God.
That is my point, usually it is a linear progression. First they speak to god, then know god, then speak for god, then are god, then are in god's hands at the looney bin.
ABE - How far should one go before reflecting upon their unquestioned position?
Edited by anglagard, : a simple question

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 1:03 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 2:37 PM anglagard has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 32 of 279 (376749)
01-13-2007 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by anglagard
01-13-2007 1:55 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
That is my point, usually it is a linear progression. First they speak to god, then know god, then speak for god, then are god, then are in god's hands at the looney bin.
ABE - How far should one go before reflecting upon their unquestioned position?
Well, I don't believe I will ever be a god until I have shed this body and am ressurected anew. Maybe you should ask a pantheist these questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by anglagard, posted 01-13-2007 1:55 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by anglagard, posted 01-13-2007 2:49 PM Rob has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 33 of 279 (376751)
01-13-2007 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Rob
01-13-2007 2:37 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
Rob writes:
Well, I don't believe I will ever be a god until I have shed this body and am ressurected anew. Maybe you should ask a pantheist these questions.
If resurrected you displace god rather than become part of God?
As to ask the panthiest, maybe you should wait until your thread is promoted before derailing this one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 2:37 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 5:56 PM anglagard has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 34 of 279 (376769)
01-13-2007 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by anglagard
01-13-2007 2:49 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
If resurrected you displace god rather than become part of God?
Patience please...
No, we become part of God. A stone in the body of Christ. A jewel of the temple so to speak. We don't become God so much as let God become us; an individual, distinct, unique and prescious as each of us is, yet at one with God's will. We get to be the real you and me, instead of the fallen and depraved men we are now.
C.S. Lewis covers it well in his chapter, 'Obstinate Toy Soldiers'.
As to ask the panthiest, maybe you should wait until your thread is promoted before derailing this one.
I don't think any pantheist really wants that debate, and that is interesting. I think it is a hit to them. It was to me... I am satisfied to let it stand there un-opposed and unpromoted. it speaks for itself. It's not my work or my genius. It is the genius that conquered my hard heart and shallow mind.
Phat is trying to keep the peace (he is conflicted), but his Lord did not come to bring peace. His Lord came to expose the darkness for what it is without fear. Even at the risk of being beaten or crucified. And He asks his disciple to be the light of the world even unto persecution and death. And warned us not to befriend those who only work to keep the light from being shined full strength. Oh how they would love to pretend it does not exist. You can preach anything but that! Keep it contained within the scientific method so as not to expose us...
Matthew 10:34 "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to turn "'a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law-- 36 a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.'
There can only be one way for man to have peace, and that is assuming that peace is one of the real purposes of the universe to begin with. We must assume that that is true or we are seeking what cannot be found. Justice, mercy, and faithfulness are either realties or they are not. We can't make them so, if in reality we are only unjust and merciful beasts.
I have never tried to derail any thread. I only try to bring into focus what I think the real answer to these questions is. When I see Christianity misrepresented as is so common at this forum, I try to explain why it is incorrect. I do the best I can without excuse or apologies. It demands more of me than you can know... All my energy and thought. My whole soul!
I try to be a light as best I can (even if only a dimwit). Everyone is looking for the same thing, but so many are trying to find it by some way that will avoid the moral dimension that Christianity boldy and unyieldingly demands of us. They hope that reality is not Christianty.
Does such a way exist? Can it be true? We sure try desperately to find one; empire after empire. Tower after tower comes tumbling down.
Christ is a glaring light and it will not be put out. The only options are to yeild to it some, and carefully reconsider, or crucify it. But when we crucify it, we draw more attention to it than if we had left it alone. We then become what we hate most. And that is the most common way for God to reveal Himself. We get a glimpse of Him, when we see our own depravity. Our illusions are dispelled very much by force. if it were up to us, we would keep them. But he makes us self aware...
The light has us surrounded. The only alternative is to deny it with full knowledge that we are doing so, and very few can actually do such a thing. I couldn't, and I tried even harder than some of you. Even the most obstinate among us still has some light that he cannot deny.
I can live with being challenged severely, threatened, and mocked. I can defend myself with God' word. I can even handle being suspended or expelled from this place.
The question is, can you?
I fear not examining myself and my beliefs. And in the process of defending them, I naturally explain my position and show it to be true. Is that preaching or apologetics?
And if I am thrown out into the abyss, there are thousands more waiting to remind you of your sins. Reality will stalk you, and call your bluff!
Luke 12:4 "I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. 5 But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. 6 Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. 7 Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don't be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows. 8 "I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God. 9 But he who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God. 10 And everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. 11 "When you are brought before synagogues, rulers and authorities, do not worry about how you will defend yourselves or what you will say, 12 for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what you should say."

Matthew 10:26 "So do not be afraid of them. There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by anglagard, posted 01-13-2007 2:49 PM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by DrJones*, posted 01-13-2007 7:20 PM Rob has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2290
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 35 of 279 (376787)
01-13-2007 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Rob
01-13-2007 5:56 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
I can even handle being suspended or expelled from this place.
This is a pretty obvious falsehood, seeing as you were expelled from this place and then snuck back in.

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 5:56 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 7:46 PM DrJones* has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 36 of 279 (376792)
01-13-2007 7:38 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Modulous
01-11-2007 3:13 PM


If there is a God, it's going to be a whole lot bigger and a whole lot more incomprehensible than anything that any theologian of any religion has ever proposed.
Amen! I already liked Dawkins, and now I may finally have become an official admirer.
I've always understood how the mystery and magnificence of the world could lead to positing the existence of God(s)--what has always puzzled me is why we should think the notions of God(s) derived from tribal culture are those most likely to be true. I, too, suspect that if there is a God, S/he is not a tricked out Superman.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Modulous, posted 01-11-2007 3:13 PM Modulous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by truthlover, posted 01-16-2007 7:36 AM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 37 of 279 (376796)
01-13-2007 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by DrJones*
01-13-2007 7:20 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
I can even handle being suspended or expelled from this place.
This is a pretty obvious falsehood, seeing as you were expelled from this place and then snuck back in.
If I could not handle it, I would not have come back. But I can...
Sneaking would be moderating my tone...
Did I moderate enough to sneak around unoticed DrJones?
You spotted my sin right away. You hate sin don't you DRJones?
An honest man need not sneak. I hid nothing in the first place. That is why I was suspended.
Go ahead... I can handle it. The reason I was shut out, is because you can't.
So preach your cynicism DrJones... your in no danger of being expelled by the cynical. Just don't preach Christ crucified. These people want to hear that science is God.
But if you do, and if you are, let them expect a ressurection.
Ok ok ok, it did bother me some... but I think I could handle it now. Not to mention that we just happened to change IP's at the same time...
Are you happy now? Or must I be buried?
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.
Edited by scottness, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by DrJones*, posted 01-13-2007 7:20 PM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by DrJones*, posted 01-13-2007 8:24 PM Rob has replied
 Message 43 by Larni, posted 01-14-2007 8:46 AM Rob has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2290
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 38 of 279 (376807)
01-13-2007 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Rob
01-13-2007 7:46 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
An honest man need not sneak
So using a new name to return to a website that you were banned from is the act of an honest man?
You hate sin don't you DRJones?
Define sin.
I hid nothing in the first place. That is why I was suspended.
As I recall you were suspended for sending unsolicited preach-mails to evc members.

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 7:46 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 9:41 PM DrJones* has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 39 of 279 (376830)
01-13-2007 9:41 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by DrJones*
01-13-2007 8:24 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
As I recall you were suspended for sending unsolicited preach-mails to evc members.
I was defending my position. Pushing an appeal. It was not harrassment, it was true and effective. it just took some time to settle in.
So using a new name to return to a website that you were banned from is the act of an honest man?
I couldn't use the old one. It was taken from me though it was my real name, Rob (Robert Scott Lockett). What is your real name DrJones?
Tell me about honesty...
Define sin.
Missing the mark.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by DrJones*, posted 01-13-2007 8:24 PM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by DrJones*, posted 01-13-2007 10:59 PM Rob has replied
 Message 61 by nator, posted 01-16-2007 11:47 AM Rob has replied
 Message 87 by Admin, posted 01-18-2007 9:20 AM Rob has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2290
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 40 of 279 (376842)
01-13-2007 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Rob
01-13-2007 9:41 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
I couldn't use the old one.
Thats cause you were Banned. Say a woman takes out a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend, and after a period of time the boyfriend shows up again with a different haircut. Would that boyfriend be an honest man?
What is your real name DrJones?
None of your business.

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 9:41 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 11:10 PM DrJones* has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 41 of 279 (376847)
01-13-2007 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by DrJones*
01-13-2007 10:59 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
Say a woman takes out a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend, and after a period of time the boyfriend shows up again with a different haircut. Would that boyfriend be an honest man?
According to whom? Did the girlfriend get the restraining order by making a false report? If so, the boyfriend may in fact do the right thing by violating the relative laws of men. But justice is justice. it is absolute!
This is fun and all Dr, but I got a bad feeling about all the replies I am getting at the moment.
Toodleloo!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by DrJones*, posted 01-13-2007 10:59 PM DrJones* has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 42 of 279 (376893)
01-14-2007 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by truthlover
01-13-2007 12:46 PM


trusthlover writes:
It is said by most on this board, and it is said by most scientists that some things are not testable by science. In such situations, a different method must be used.
I would be interested to see things that we know are real and yet cannot be tested scientifically.
truthlover writes:
We could perhaps do things to test whether my aunt really saw a ghost. We could give her a lie detector test.
That is not an appropriate way to determine the plausibility of her story. Her story (that she saw a ghost) would be our hypothesis. We would then try to reject that hypothesis. If we could not reject it (because the evidence so strongly supports it) we could conclude (within a given margin of error) that her story was probably true. Thats as far as (scientifically) we could go.
truthlover writes:
I have no idea what a PKE meter is,
Sorry about that, it's the prentend ghost detector in 'Ghostbusters'. I was not being serious. But it highlights that for something to be real you must have some indication that it exist. This expression of existance must be detectable somehow. If so we can measure it.
truthlover writes:
most people say God can't be tested by science.
Gods can't be tested by science in the same way the Flying Spagetti Monster or the Invisible Pink Unicorn can't be tested by science: there is nothing to test for.
truthlover writes:
I agree, but that doesn't leave us with nothing. It leaves us with other methods to find truth, the same methods used in a courtroom, in history, in investigative reporting, etc.
These are the poorest ways tha we have to establish the facts. A 12 person jury trial is a joke. Anything that include human perseption is inherently flawed. That is why we use self correcting scientific methodologies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by truthlover, posted 01-13-2007 12:46 PM truthlover has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by truthlover, posted 01-16-2007 7:27 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 43 of 279 (376895)
01-14-2007 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Rob
01-13-2007 7:46 PM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
scottness writes:
These people want to hear that science is God.
Why do believers always give god based motivations to people who do not subscribe to belief in gods? I don't have a god shaped hole in my head that needs filling.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Rob, posted 01-13-2007 7:46 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 10:54 AM Larni has replied
 Message 46 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 1:32 PM Larni has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5878 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 44 of 279 (376908)
01-14-2007 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Larni
01-14-2007 8:46 AM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
Why do believers always give god based motivations to people who do not subscribe to belief in gods? I don't have a god shaped hole in my head that needs filling.
Because we all have a theological position. It is the foundation for our assumptions. Some are just more logical than others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Larni, posted 01-14-2007 8:46 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Larni, posted 01-14-2007 12:47 PM Rob has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 45 of 279 (376926)
01-14-2007 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Rob
01-14-2007 10:54 AM


Re: Absurd to the Extreme
scottness writes:
It is the foundation for our assumptions.
Rubbish.
Start another thread and we can dicuss your position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 10:54 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 1:47 PM Larni has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024