Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Your eternal destination: you decide.
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 192 of 246 (361777)
11-05-2006 2:57 AM
Reply to: Message 187 by AnswersInGenitals
11-04-2006 8:00 PM


Re: beyond . . . doubt, but not redemption
I don't know anything about afterlife, but I know what I like...
AnswersInGenitals:
There was recently a thread in this forum asking people's opinion on whether Hitler went to heaven or hell. I didn't read or participate in that forum, but I believe he was reincarnated as a dung beetle on a small island where all the animals have very serious diarrhea.
I like.
It will take him thousands of reincarnations before he's even human again. But he does get more chances to see if he can get life right.
The insight I get from the idea of reincarnation is that life is a learning process. Mistakes are built into the process of learning. They enable it. In time you reduce them as you understand more of the material.
Judeo-Christian concepts owe more to judiciary models. Life is about laws, infractions, punishments and clemency. The model tells us much about the nature of the human conscience, but it has trouble with aspects of the universe that cannot be intepreted this way.
Hell, even Jerry Falwell is converting over to the more rational and certainly more divine eastern ways of belief, although I understand that in his case, the conversion occurred when he first noticed how similar his appearance is to the Bhudda.
It's still going to be a long time before Falwell can crack that beatific smile.
So, Iano's OP challenge is completely beside any point and irrelevant. Whenever you die, do you want your eternal fate to be decided by just your first beta-version attempt at life, or by an exquisite sequence of personal growth and gaining of wisdom; of deaths and rebirths that bring you ever closer to to your ideal existence?
You have to think any eternal, ominpresent and omnipotent creator worthy of the description would understand what we face here. Our lives are pitifully brief and we're compelled to sleep away a third even of that. Our experiences are limited, our ideas uncertain, and our survival issues pressing.
To imagine such a being consigning us to eternal anguish for reaching an inaccurate conclusion about invisible things during the brief opportunity afforded us to ponder the matter... well, let's just say that would be a strange way to run a universe.
So strange, in fact, that the image suggests less about eternal reality than it does about human fears. The fear of hell is the fear that you might have made an irreversible mistake--or the fear that someone else might not abide by your rules unless properly cowed.
The behaviors we've seen on display in this thread confirm as much.
At first it appears we are being asked to consider the possibility of heaven and hell for the sake of argument. When the author of the OP shrinks from answering the same question turned back on himself, you see what's really going on. The OP isn't (as we are later told) about hypotheticals. So what is it about?
The OP attempts to impose a structure on the rest of us and get us to take roles in it. We are asked to do so regardless of whether or not we buy into the worldview it reflects.
As in this thread, so in society. Fundamentalists contrive to impose order--their order--on those around them. The universe, as always, proves to be remarkably uncooperative with the project. When it demands self-examination from those who hope to impose the structure, they run.
___
Edited by Archer Opterix, : format.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : HTML.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 11-04-2006 8:00 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by iceage, posted 11-05-2006 3:08 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 196 of 246 (361838)
11-05-2006 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by alacrity fitzhugh
11-05-2006 11:08 AM


Re: beyond . . . doubt
Thanks, AF, for a lovely picture of a lovely lady.
Where did I ever say I believed in god/s?
I understood ts to be speaking generally--a bit of wisdom in harmony with your comment in Message 189 about not limiting oneself.
I'd like to put that in my quote file, ts. Is that original with you?
___
Edited by Archer Opterix, : HTML.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 11-05-2006 11:08 AM alacrity fitzhugh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by alacrity fitzhugh, posted 11-05-2006 2:44 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 222 of 246 (362820)
11-09-2006 8:48 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by riVeRraT
11-09-2006 1:53 AM


Re: beyond a shadow of a doubt
riVeRraT:
So let me ask you a question, you feel it is impossible for two people to feel exactly the same thing?
If there are 60,000 people at a footbal game, and the home team scores a touchdown, you don't think that a large percentage of people will all happy together?
You initially mentioned kinship of feelings as evidence of an extraordinary shared experience that lent credibility--'beyond the shadow of a doubt'--to a particular religion. Now you say you were only talking about ordinary shared experience--nothing different in kind than fans experience at a ball game. Which is it?
Florida State plays Penn State in the Orange Bowl. One team scores a touchdown. Half the fans are happy and half the fans are disappointed.
Does the happiness of the happy fans indicate they have chosen the 'true' football team for their support? Do the disappointed fans support a 'false' team? If so, what does it mean if the lead changes? If not, can it be that either choice is valid? If either choice is valid, what is really being proven 'beyond the shadow of a doubt' when any fan feels happy?
____

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by riVeRraT, posted 11-09-2006 1:53 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by riVeRraT, posted 11-09-2006 9:48 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024