Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Paul of Tarsus - the first Christian?
iano
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 189 of 219 (308724)
05-03-2006 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 183 by truthlover
04-20-2006 10:12 PM


Objectionable?
That's bizarre, and it makes God a robot or a sadist, one or the other. It's unjust at the core, allowing horridly unkind and unloving believers to enter eternal bliss, while unbelievers of the most wonderful demeanor are tortured forever. Everyone's heart objects to this, even Christians' hearts.
It seems just that sin will have to be punished according to the measure of its commital
It seems perfectly acceptable that God would be able to provide a mechanism whereby that which must be punished could be paid for by someone who was willing to pay the price for another. Love would be a sufficient motivator to devise such a mechanism - the only person having to be satisfied by the nature and workings of the mechanism being the designer(s) of it
It seems that 'horrid/wonderful demeanour' is a purely subjective notion and that a persons basic intuition would tell them that our standards for what constitutes 'horrid/wonderful demeanour' might not be Gods standards. Yes, some are better than others according to our standards. But compared to Gods standards is the separation all that great? Is there any separation of note at all?
It seems perfectly reasonable that God can set the entry point to eternal bliss at any level he wants. If that level is 100% perfection then that is his perogative. That no one can reach it by their own behaviour alters that not - God is under no obligation to anyone.
It seems reasonable that God can offer a free-willed person a choice to have another pay the price for their own sin. And reasonable that a free-willed person is free to reject the offer
Whats unreasonable about any of this?
Everyone's heart objects to this, even Christians' hearts.
It may cause my heart anguish. It may cause me to, in my very best moments, wish along with Paul, that I might be lost that another be saved (knowing however, along with Paul, that that is impossible). It might make me plead and beg with people and take the obvious flak that goes with the territory of something so wildly outlandish (if reasonable). It might bring me to my knees in pleading prayer
But object I do not. A guilty man objecting to justice applied to him forms a rather hollow basis for objection
(if its too OT then by all means ignore the post TL)
This message has been edited by iano, 03-May-2006 02:48 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by truthlover, posted 04-20-2006 10:12 PM truthlover has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by Legend, posted 05-03-2006 6:25 PM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 192 of 219 (308866)
05-03-2006 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by Legend
05-03-2006 6:25 PM


Re: Objectionable?
Not just at the mo thanks Legend. Was hoping for a quick OT aside from TL. I find a surprising amount of stuff he talks of being that with which I agree and I was just curious to fill in another blank so as to converge on the point on which our paths diverge.
Nailing TLs POV is only slighty more difficult than nailing Jars POV which is only slightly more difficult than nailing jelly to a wall
Its as simple as that!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Legend, posted 05-03-2006 6:25 PM Legend has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 196 of 219 (309367)
05-05-2006 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by Legend
05-03-2006 6:22 PM


Psst! Wanna see a conversion?
Legend writes:
yes I agree, Jesus expanded the ten commandments.
Me too. Not adding, just expounding. He expanded them enough to demonstrate that all are sinners - lest there be doubt. Then he compressed them into two rules. Love God/love neighbour
Romans 7, the way I understand it, is all about how the law cannot bring life. Flesh is the cause of sin (Rom 7:5,6). Because of sin and the dominance of flesh, men find it impossible to follow the law. Paul himself moans about how he's held captive by his own flesh and awaits deliverance (Rom 7:24).
There is much which stands to reason. See what you think Legend.
1Do you not know, brothers”for I am speaking to men who know the law”that the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives? 2For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage. 3So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.
All law demands obedience. Both our own worldy law and the biblical law. Our law /commandments must be followed or punishment will ensure. "Do this, don't do that - or else". And at any point in life one is subject to it. But if one has committed a crime in everyday life, say a murder, and dies before the trial (Judgment), then the law is powerless. You have escaped its domain. Paul is talking common sense. But he is also talking about our spiritual condition. It is not just our bodies which are subject to Gods law, but also our spirits. Whilst our bodies can escape the temporal aspects of Gods law (pain, decay, disease and finally death) by dying, our eternal spirit, as it is, cannot. For the law is eternal also. The only way our spirit can escape the punishing intent of the spiritual police is if somehow or other it can be induced to die. And in doing so, flee the juristiction. But how can an already dead-to-God spirit die? By inverting Pauls analogy: bring the dead spirit to life. Change the juristiction in which it dwells ti whit: translate it out from its positon under the reign of the law of sin and death
Paul tells us in the very next sentence that this has in fact happened to a Christian. They have 'died', spiritually to the law. The law-as-punishment can no more claim juristiction over them spiritually than can temporal law claim juristiction over us when we physically die. It happens only through Christ ("nobody comes to the father except THROUGH me")
4So, my brothers, you also died (spiritually) to the (punishing)law (of sin and death) through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.(no spiritual dying > no spiritual fruit bearing) 5For when we were controlled by the sinful nature,[a] the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death. 6But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.
If law means "do this, do that" and we are released from it by dying then we are no longer captive to the power of the law. And the only power the law of sin and death has is to punish us for not complying. The Law cannot make a person comply in and of itself. Indeed Paul appears to be blaming the Law for causing us to become absolute law breakers. A possible conclusion. But...
7What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet." 8But sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of covetous desire. For apart from law, sin is dead. 9Once I was alive apart from law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died. 10I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death.
Laws purpose explained. The purpose of the law is to let a man know he is a sinner. The example of offence Paul gives: covetting, existed before the law came. Adding the law let people know clearly that this was an offence.
The law started out with "Don't eat of the fruit" and expanded right out with Jesus' exposition on the mount. To wrap it all up, Jesus summed all possible sin that could ever be carried out in thought, word or deed by issuing 2 golden rules: love God (don't offend him in any way) love you neighbour (don't offend him in any way). 1000's of ways to sin every single day. Impossible to avoid doing. Unless dead to law, the law has you completely within its grasp
11For sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, deceived me, and through the commandment put me to death. 12So then, the law is holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous and good. 13Did that which is good, then, become death to me? By no means! But in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it produced death in me through what was good, so that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful.
The law holy though it is, was issued so that sin, doing only as evil can do, would use it to trap you in its clutches. Not a little bit sinful but completely and totally sinful. The more law the more sin you are guilty of committing. Steeped up to the neck in it. Jesus' 2 rules provides a law which can convict us of every thought. word and deed we could have - should we ever transgress.
14We know that the law is spiritual (like I said above); but I am unspiritual (born in Adam - with a dead-to-God spirit), sold (by the law) as a slave to sin. 15I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. 17As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. 18I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature.[c] For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do”this I keep on doing. 20Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
This is not Paul speaking of himself in this incidently. He is not describing himself personally as if this applied to him at the time of writing. The grammatical tense used when he says "I am this that and the other's" has made a switch to a perpetual tense where he throws his voice as it were, and speaks the mind of "everyman". He is describing that which is going through a mans mind when the law (the schoolteacher) begins the final leg of its intended work of leading a person to Christ. Everyman has arrived at the point of conversion.
Point of conversion is what is being described all the way up to end of chapter. Everyman is coming to see that the law is in fact good. Whereas before, it was something that cramped his style and was to be circumvented (by following the temporal letter and not the spiritual spirit of it) he nows sees it as good. Adultery isn't a bit of fun whose guilt induced must be buried a.s.a.p., it actually is wrong: it destroys lives and makes people unhappy. Anger is wrong. Rather than point the finger and justify ones getting angry - everymans starts to see the hurt and pain it causes. Breaking the speed limit cos he is in a rush is wrong - he sees he is unjustified in putting precious lives and others health at risk.
"BUT I STILL DO IT!" Having this knowledge of the laws goodness is tormenting him. For knowing it and concurring with it - yea even WANTING to follow it does him no good. For he finds he still breaks it - even though he doesn't want to!
What is a behaviour that one hates increasingly, yet is one which one finds one cannot give up. Its called and addiction. Slavery. A addicted slave to sin. "I thought I was my own all along. I thought I was making my own choices according to my own free-will, I had my morality worked out and that according to that I was a fine fellow (even if I slipped occasionally but hey! who doesn't). I didn't realise the drug I choose to ingest. I didn't realise it would prove habit forming. I didn't see, like any other addict, that I would become completely dependant in it"
Paul continues describing the torment of the person being convicted (convinced) by the law....
21So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. 22For in my inner being I delight in God's law; 23but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members.
Prior to this, the law has been something which the man has twisted and contorted to suit his own book. Now it turns on him like a roaring lion. Aslan is not a tame lion. The Law of sin and death pins him in a corner and screams in his face
"YOU'RE AN ADDICTED, HELPLESS LAWBREAKER. AND YOU ALSO REALISE NOW WHAT THE WAGES OF THAT ARE"
24What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death?
The cry of sheer anguish of an addict. He resides in a body which is filled with sin. He is trapped. Its going down and he is going down with it. There are no excuses to hide behind anymore. His state of addiction and helplessness has been fully revealed. There is nowhere left to turn. Paul doesn't enter into the private moment that occurs when everyman turns to the only one who can help him now. There are billions of people and billions of ways in which the appeal might be couched. Perhaps it could be this thought which instigates the turning back to God. The thought that causes the Prodigal to lift his head from the pigstys trough.
"All who call on the name of the Lord shall be saved"
25Thanks be to God”through Jesus Christ our Lord!
Everymans post-conversion exclamation.
So then, I myself in my mind am a slave to God's law, but in the sinful nature a slave to the law of sin.
The split has occured. No longer a dying physical body umbilically attached to an already dead-in-Adam spirit. Instead a physically dying body being progressively shed from an alive-in-Christ spirit. That dead spirit has been re-born into life. It is freed from the law of sin and death. It is freed from the death-like grip of the Law.
A justified spirit, made righteous in Christ contained within a sinful flesh can only result in one thing. War! A war we are henceforth exhorted to fight. Until the day the dying flesh draws its last breath is finally reunited with a new body. A glorified body. A resurrection body. A body just like Jesus' body.
To enjoy Him forever.
This message has been edited by iano, 05-May-2006 04:39 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Legend, posted 05-03-2006 6:22 PM Legend has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 204 of 219 (309707)
05-06-2006 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by ringo
05-06-2006 2:11 PM


Re: Criteria for Judging the Major Event
A technical interlude...
Next time you go to a pop concert Ringo, nip around to the maintenance area (from the "US government demolished the Twin Towers" conspiracy thread, I gather you know the ins and outs of those). Pull the circuit breaker marked "Mains Power" and see how far the protagonists voices travel thereafter.
The sermon on the mount was a long enough teaching. There is no record of Jesus being hoarse afterwards
Carry on..

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by ringo, posted 05-06-2006 2:11 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 05-06-2006 2:39 PM iano has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 217 of 219 (360779)
11-02-2006 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 216 by chapalot
11-02-2006 11:19 AM


Re: You are correct.
Paul was also at odds with the twelve disciples, in fact the Essenes, among many others considered him to be the first corrupter of the teachings of Jesus Crist. You are correct when you say Paul "invented Christianity."
At least one apostle openly doesn't agree with you.
quote:
2 Peter 3: 15Bear in mind that our Lord's patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
The use of the term "the other scriptures" is interesting. Apostlic blessing that the writings of Paul are scripture. I wonder had the Essenes any apostolic blessings on their writings?
Or are we to rely on the non-scriptural musings of men.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by chapalot, posted 11-02-2006 11:19 AM chapalot has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by Equinox, posted 11-02-2006 12:16 PM iano has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024