quote:
I just admitted I made an assumption because your previous posts were right leaning and NOT that they said you believed in God.
That's twice you haven't properly read something I wrote.
I read your post just fine. I don't understand how you came to the assumption I was an Xtian. Simply saying my views were "right leaning" isn't sufficient enough to brand some one religious. I was pointing this out to you, again.
quote:
If all you do is write to get a rise out of people, you just hit my kill filter chum. I came here to discuss and debate, not get sucked into meaningless conversations with jerks.
We are debating are we not? The purpose is to win the debate not to give a monotone speech. Let me lay it out for you, chum:
1. I say something to get you mad.
2. You spout off (which would be out of form for you).
3. You lose credibility in the debate.
4. Your temper loss results in my views being more attractive.
Now me saying "holmes is an idiot" would not be appropriate and I have not done any such thing.
Of course "stone throwing Xtians" wasn't mean spirited was it? I'm sure that's your term of endearment just as whore was mine.
I am honest and admit the tactic. Others use the tactic but feign ignorance to it. Why is this an issue?
quote:
Again, you can't seem to read. I didn't say your post was an attempt to refute mine.
I stated quite clearly my realization that we had been in agreement the whole time, and then puzzled why you'd attack me and prostitutes so personally since we were in agreement.
I got my answer now. You are a jerk, trying to get a rise out of me rather than saying anything intelligent.
No, clearly would be "Do you agree with what I said?" Instead you imply I didn't understand the contents of your post and didn't agree with it. Or perhaps I read it that way. I am sorry if that is the case.
quote:
I never said that, and I don't believe that. I stated quite clearly that there are people that get hurt and aren't happy.
I never said you said it either. It is what I interpreted from your posts. It appears i'm not the only one.
quote:
Since you just admitted that you make posts to simply piss people off, and you can't seem to read (maybe just to get a rise?) I will not be talking to you again.
I admitted to making one post to get a rise out of you. Not all posts. The original post to this thread appears to be the same thing. You wanted to "spank" schraf and satcomm and were quite malicious about it. Don't point your finger at me hypocrite.