Dear Admin,
Thanks for your assistance.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have noticed that Peter has often asked the admin to close threads he was clearly losing debates in
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the record, there are 3 closed Peter Borger topics (all in the "Evolution" forum).
1)molecular genetic proof against random mutation(1)
2) More non-random evolution
3) scientific end of evolution theory (2)
I haven't (at least recently) done any heavy analysis to why these topics were closed.
PB: They were closed because I wanted them to. Consolidation of the GUToB will be carried out in the open threads.
One possible reason is that the discussion had wandered off topic.
PB: And because of lack of response for more than a month. And because more scientific proof of NRM have been scientifically demonstrated in Dr Caporale's thread. I am scientifically backed up. As claimed all the time and should now be acknowledges bu everybody (except atheists, of course, but that's the usual denial).
Another possible reason (and I suspect this may be the real one) is to consolidate the discussion into a lesser number of topics, rather than having redundant discussions in several topics.
PB: Exactly.
In all, I don't really think it is a matter of Peter Borger trying to dodge discussion. But hey, I may be wrong.
PB: Why would I dodge discussion that I am winning?
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit - The topics can be re-opened.
PB: Yeah, why not? It's a hot topic.
best wishes,
Peter