Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Vatican snubs ID
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 4 of 22 (261658)
11-20-2005 8:54 PM


DI ID Denial
FROM the DI of ID
In Evolution Debate the Media Are More Catholic Than the Pope | Evolution News
One reads with astonishment the major stories written by the AP and various news and broadcast outlets the past two days; to wit, "Vatican Official Refutes Intelligent Design." There is even a ham-fisted attempt by the Lawrence (Kansas) Journal-World to use the anti-ID statement of junior Vatican official Dr. George Coyne, director of the Vatican Observatory, to pound the Kansas State Board of Education for their new standards on teaching evolution
(links in the original)
ROFLOL.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 11*20*2005 08:55 PM

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by bkelly, posted 11-20-2005 9:53 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 7 of 22 (261694)
11-20-2005 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by bkelly
11-20-2005 9:53 PM


That's from the discovery institute itself ... the "DI" ... the main proponents of ID.
Of course they have an axe to grind eh? LOL
ps -- not crash?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by bkelly, posted 11-20-2005 9:53 PM bkelly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by bkelly, posted 11-21-2005 10:09 AM RAZD has not replied
 Message 11 by Nuggin, posted 11-21-2005 1:59 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 12 of 22 (262126)
11-21-2005 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by wiseman45
11-21-2005 1:44 PM


Re: Why is the debate allowed to continue?
I have not problem with discussing ID in a public forum as long as the pros and the cons of the concept are fully discussed so that people can make up their minds on the validity of the concept.
I also see no reason to restrict discussion of design concepts as long as both sides of the design controversy are presented. For more on this see
EvC Forum: Silly Design Institute: Let's discuss BOTH sides of the Design Controversy...
The proper {place\venue\arena\field} for this kind of discussion though - imh(ysa)o - is philosophy. The reason for this is that philosophy can include metaphysical logical constructs as well as science and it does not need to be redefined to make ID concepts fit. Many ID proponents admit this to some extent as they frequently discuss the philosophy of science.
The main area where I have problems with ID is where they are trying to scam people, such as through the misrepresentation of the signature document actually questioning evolution rather than expressing normal scientific skepticism and caution. I have demonstrated the logic of this at truthmapping.com as well
http://www.truthmapping.com/viewtopic.php?id=436
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by wiseman45, posted 11-21-2005 1:44 PM wiseman45 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Nighttrain, posted 11-21-2005 6:41 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 14 of 22 (262135)
11-21-2005 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Nighttrain
11-21-2005 6:41 PM


Re: Why is the debate allowed to continue?
the silly plan ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Nighttrain, posted 11-21-2005 6:41 PM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024