Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Great Debate proposal: seat swap
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5192 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 1 of 4 (261447)
11-20-2005 4:10 AM


I propose a Great Debate topic where Randman and his choice of the supporters of Evolution have it out on the topic of is Abiogenesis part of evolution or not.
But here is the twist Rand must argue the Evolutionist side and the Evo must argue the Creationist side.
All I will ask is that I’m not chosen as I am not conversant enough with the bible as to be able to quote it Chapter and verse ( a skill I fear would be needed to do this justice)
{Title edit - Changed "GB" (which should have been "GD") to "Great Debate". - Adminnemooseus)
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 11-20-2005 10:17 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminNWR, posted 11-20-2005 8:46 AM ohnhai has replied

AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 4 (261500)
11-20-2005 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
11-20-2005 4:10 AM


This was tried
The idea of arguing for the reverse position was tried in Upside-down Day (see also Upside Down Day Comment Thread). It was setup as a general discussion thread, rather than a Great Debate thread.
In my opinion, it didn't work out all that well. I doubt that making it a GD would have changed that.
I will leave this PNT open for a while. If there is are evolutionists who really want to do this, they should post their application(s) to Topic Proposal Issues. If there are one or more applicants, then randman can post to the same thread as the applicants, to indicate his willingness to participate. Or, if he prefers, he can post that he is not willing (and without waiting for applicants).
If ohnhai wishes to refine the idea, or make other related suggestions, he should reply to this message.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 11-20-2005 4:10 AM ohnhai has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by ohnhai, posted 11-20-2005 8:54 AM AdminNWR has replied

ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5192 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 3 of 4 (261501)
11-20-2005 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminNWR
11-20-2005 8:46 AM


Re: This was tried
happy to let it go if it's felt that it wont work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminNWR, posted 11-20-2005 8:46 AM AdminNWR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminNWR, posted 11-20-2005 10:20 AM ohnhai has not replied

AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 4 (261520)
11-20-2005 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by ohnhai
11-20-2005 8:54 AM


Re: This was tried
I am closing this PNT for the present. We can reopen it later, if appropriate. Randman has a lot going on at the moment, with both challenges and his own proposed new thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by ohnhai, posted 11-20-2005 8:54 AM ohnhai has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024