Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   for Conspirator
Percy
Member
Posts: 22508
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 2 of 19 (25597)
12-05-2002 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by derwood
12-05-2002 10:07 AM


Excepting the opening and closing, this post's strong objective focus is very helpful and informative, especially the excerpts.
It might make sense for you to delete this thread and repost this in response to Conspirator's original thread.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by derwood, posted 12-05-2002 10:07 AM derwood has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22508
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 4 of 19 (25616)
12-05-2002 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Coragyps
12-05-2002 2:21 PM


Coragyps writes:
I could be wrong, SLPx, but I think you aimed that post too high. Way too high.
It is not an uncommon event here for someone to take a list of questions they find somewhere and post them (though usually with attribution). But one of the problems with responding to these questions is that since the person didn't compose the questions himself there is no way to know if he understands the questions, or even agrees with all of them. You often find that the questions posted represent views that the person posting them is ill-equipped to defend. The whole approach is indicative of intellectual laziness combined with unfamiliarity with the details of the topic.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Coragyps, posted 12-05-2002 2:21 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by wj, posted 12-05-2002 5:38 PM Percy has replied
 Message 7 by gene90, posted 12-05-2002 7:25 PM Percy has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22508
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 6 of 19 (25642)
12-05-2002 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by wj
12-05-2002 5:38 PM


Sorry, you're right, I didn't mean to discourage anyone from responding. But it *does* help to keep in mind the possibility that the person for whom the effort of a detailed reply is being made doesn't care about the actually science and isn't interested in understanding the issues, but is simply upset by the threat of evolution and is lashing out. And even when that does turn out to be the case, an informed response may prove very helpful to others.
--Percy
[This message has been edited by Percipient, 12-06-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by wj, posted 12-05-2002 5:38 PM wj has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024